Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer,
| Judge | Martin,Pentelechuk,Rowbotham |
| Citation | 2023 ABCA 128 |
| Docket Number | 2101-0331AC; 2201-0033AC; 2201-0034AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 24 April 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Sunridge Nissan Inc. v McRuer,
...And Between: Sunridge Nissan Inc and Boundary Investments Ltd Appellants (Plaintiffs) and Monica McRuer Respondent (Defendant) 2023 ABCA 128 The Court: The Honourable Justice Peter Martin The Honourable Justice Patricia Rowbotham The Honourable Justice Dawn Pentelechuk Docket: 2101-0331AC 2......
-
Petropoulos v Petropoulos,
...a rough measure of how much should have been incurred: Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87 at paras 53-61; Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57. Here, none of the underlying information was provided. Absent was a proposed Bill of Costs on either a solicitor-client basis or u......
-
Sutherland v Sutherland,
...costs must be justified. Importantly, the costs claimed must be proportionate to the amounts in issue: Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para. 58. The issue is not simply how much the successful party spent, but how much that party can reasonably expect the other party to pay. ......
3 cases
-
Petropoulos v Petropoulos,
...a rough measure of how much should have been incurred: Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87 at paras 53-61; Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57. Here, none of the underlying information was provided. Absent was a proposed Bill of Costs on either a solicitor-client basis or u......
-
Sunridge Nissan Inc. v McRuer,
...And Between: Sunridge Nissan Inc and Boundary Investments Ltd Appellants (Plaintiffs) and Monica McRuer Respondent (Defendant) 2023 ABCA 128 The Court: The Honourable Justice Peter Martin The Honourable Justice Patricia Rowbotham The Honourable Justice Dawn Pentelechuk Docket: 2101-0331AC 2......
-
Sutherland v Sutherland,
...costs must be justified. Importantly, the costs claimed must be proportionate to the amounts in issue: Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para. 58. The issue is not simply how much the successful party spent, but how much that party can reasonably expect the other party to pay. ......