Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer,

JudgeMartin,Pentelechuk,Rowbotham
Citation2023 ABCA 128
Docket Number2101-0331AC; 2201-0033AC; 2201-0034AC
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date24 April 2023
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Sunridge Nissan Inc. v McRuer,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 24, 2023
    ...And Between: Sunridge Nissan Inc and Boundary Investments Ltd Appellants (Plaintiffs) and Monica McRuer Respondent (Defendant) 2023 ABCA 128 The Court: The Honourable Justice Peter Martin The Honourable Justice Patricia Rowbotham The Honourable Justice Dawn Pentelechuk Docket: 2101-0331AC 2......
  • Petropoulos v Petropoulos,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 19, 2023
    ...a rough measure of how much should have been incurred: Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87 at paras 53-61; Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57. Here, none of the underlying information was provided. Absent was a proposed Bill of Costs on either a solicitor-client basis or u......
  • Sutherland v Sutherland,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 14, 2023
    ...costs must be justified. Importantly, the costs claimed must be proportionate to the amounts in issue: Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para. 58. The issue is not simply how much the successful party spent, but how much that party can reasonably expect the other party to pay. ......
3 cases
  • Sunridge Nissan Inc. v McRuer,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 24, 2023
    ...And Between: Sunridge Nissan Inc and Boundary Investments Ltd Appellants (Plaintiffs) and Monica McRuer Respondent (Defendant) 2023 ABCA 128 The Court: The Honourable Justice Peter Martin The Honourable Justice Patricia Rowbotham The Honourable Justice Dawn Pentelechuk Docket: 2101-0331AC 2......
  • Petropoulos v Petropoulos,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 19, 2023
    ...a rough measure of how much should have been incurred: Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87 at paras 53-61; Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57. Here, none of the underlying information was provided. Absent was a proposed Bill of Costs on either a solicitor-client basis or u......
  • Sutherland v Sutherland,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 14, 2023
    ...costs must be justified. Importantly, the costs claimed must be proportionate to the amounts in issue: Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para. 58. The issue is not simply how much the successful party spent, but how much that party can reasonably expect the other party to pay. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT