Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer,

JurisdictionAlberta
JudgeMartin,Pentelechuk,Rowbotham
Citation2023 ABCA 128
Docket Number2101-0331AC; 2201-0033AC; 2201-0034AC
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date24 April 2023
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • Ehli v Lamanator Coatings Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 10 Junio 2024
    ...a rough measure of how much should have been incurred: Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87 at paras 53-61; Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57. Here, none of the underlying information was provided. Absent was a proposed Bill of Costs on either a solicitor-client basis or u......
  • Prevatt v Prevatt,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 28 Junio 2024
    ...in Rule 10.33: Sutherland v Sutherland, 2023 ABCA 185 at para 4; citing Barkwell at paras 52-61; and Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at paras 57-58; Kantor v Kantor, 2023 ABCA 329 at paras 19 The Court of Appeal also noted in Barkwell at para 56 that: The starting point is to re......
  • Petropoulos v Petropoulos,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19 Junio 2023
    ...a rough measure of how much should have been incurred: Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87 at paras 53-61; Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57. Here, none of the underlying information was provided. Absent was a proposed Bill of Costs on either a solicitor-client basis or u......
  • Baker Law Firm v Colors Unlimited Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 25 Abril 2024
    ...clarified the application of the “ McAllister approach” in Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87. In Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57, the Court of Appeal summarized the principles to be drawn from Barkwell as follows: As this Court recently stated in Barkwell v McDonald, ......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • Ehli v Lamanator Coatings Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 10 Junio 2024
    ...a rough measure of how much should have been incurred: Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87 at paras 53-61; Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57. Here, none of the underlying information was provided. Absent was a proposed Bill of Costs on either a solicitor-client basis or u......
  • Prevatt v Prevatt,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 28 Junio 2024
    ...in Rule 10.33: Sutherland v Sutherland, 2023 ABCA 185 at para 4; citing Barkwell at paras 52-61; and Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at paras 57-58; Kantor v Kantor, 2023 ABCA 329 at paras 19 The Court of Appeal also noted in Barkwell at para 56 that: The starting point is to re......
  • Petropoulos v Petropoulos,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19 Junio 2023
    ...a rough measure of how much should have been incurred: Barkwell v McDonald, 2023 ABCA 87 at paras 53-61; Sunridge Nissan Inc v McRuer, 2023 ABCA 128 at para 57. Here, none of the underlying information was provided. Absent was a proposed Bill of Costs on either a solicitor-client basis or u......
  • Sunridge Nissan Inc. v McRuer,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 24 Abril 2023
    ...And Between: Sunridge Nissan Inc and Boundary Investments Ltd Appellants (Plaintiffs) and Monica McRuer Respondent (Defendant) 2023 ABCA 128 The Court: The Honourable Justice Peter Martin The Honourable Justice Patricia Rowbotham The Honourable Justice Dawn Pentelechuk Docket: 2101-0331AC 2......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT