Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeGroves, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,MUNICIPAL LAW,TORTS,LAND REGULATION
Date06 December 2007
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Buena Vista Kennels 1979 Inc., 2010 SKQB 195
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 1 Junio 2010
    ...SKCA 98, refd to. [para. 30]. Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78; 45 M.P.L.R.(4th) 133; 2007 BCSC 1754, refd to. [para. R. v. Sault Ste. Marie (City), [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299; 21 N.R. 295, refd to. [para. 50]. Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2008] B......
  • Chase (Village) v. Garrick Automotive Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 Marzo 2022
    ...MacNutt et al v. The Queen (1972) 5 W.W.R. 402. [MacNutt] [32]    In Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard, 2007 BCSC 1754, the defendant property owners argued that the bylaw concerning dog kennel noise abatement was so restrictive that it robbed them of their legal......
2 cases
  • R. v. Buena Vista Kennels 1979 Inc., 2010 SKQB 195
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 1 Junio 2010
    ...SKCA 98, refd to. [para. 30]. Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. G78; 45 M.P.L.R.(4th) 133; 2007 BCSC 1754, refd to. [para. R. v. Sault Ste. Marie (City), [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299; 21 N.R. 295, refd to. [para. 50]. Coquitlam (City) v. Crawford, [2008] B......
  • Chase (Village) v. Garrick Automotive Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 Marzo 2022
    ...MacNutt et al v. The Queen (1972) 5 W.W.R. 402. [MacNutt] [32]    In Sunshine Coast (Regional District) v. Sheppard, 2007 BCSC 1754, the defendant property owners argued that the bylaw concerning dog kennel noise abatement was so restrictive that it robbed them of their legal......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT