Surespan Construction Ltd. v. Saskatchewan, [2013] Sask.R. Uned. 5
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Ball, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CROWN,PRACTICE,BUILDING CONTRACTS,CONTRACTS |
| Citation | [2013] Sask.R. Uned. 5,[2013] Sask.R. Uned. 5 (QB),2013 SKQB 23 |
| Date | 22 January 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Thunder Bay (City) v. Canadian National Railway Company, 2018 ONCA 919
...conditional on denial of a request for leave to appeal is likely to be practically feasible: Surespan Construction Ltd. v. Saskatchewan, 2013 SKQB 23, 10 B.L.R. (5th) 117; Trevor Nicholas Construction Co. v. Canada (2000), 2 C.L.R. (3d) 176 (F.C.T.D.); Foundation Building West Inc. v. Vanco......
-
Surespan v Gov of SK, 2017 SKQB 55
...out Surespan’s claim on the ground that it disclosed no reasonable cause of action. The application was dismissed on January 22, 2013 (See 2013 SKQB 23, 10 BLR 117) on the basis that it was not plain and obvious the claim should be stuck. The parties proceeded with the litigation process b......
2 cases
-
Thunder Bay (City) v. Canadian National Railway Company, 2018 ONCA 919
...conditional on denial of a request for leave to appeal is likely to be practically feasible: Surespan Construction Ltd. v. Saskatchewan, 2013 SKQB 23, 10 B.L.R. (5th) 117; Trevor Nicholas Construction Co. v. Canada (2000), 2 C.L.R. (3d) 176 (F.C.T.D.); Foundation Building West Inc. v. Vanco......
-
Surespan v Gov of SK, 2017 SKQB 55
...out Surespan’s claim on the ground that it disclosed no reasonable cause of action. The application was dismissed on January 22, 2013 (See 2013 SKQB 23, 10 BLR 117) on the basis that it was not plain and obvious the claim should be stuck. The parties proceeded with the litigation process b......