Szopa v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 47
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Bennett,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock,The Honourable Mr. Justice Goepel |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 47 |
| Date | 28 January 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA45625 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Yang v. Shi, 2022 BCCA 317 ' Summary Determinations At The Court Of Appeal
...allows a party to apply to strike part of a factum or raise a preliminary objection to an appeal. 3. Szopa v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 47 at para. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about y......
-
Chamberlin v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia,
...that it constitutes an abuse of process. This Court has repeatedly affirmed this principle: see, e.g., Szopa v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 47 at para. 13. Furthermore, this Court has statutory jurisdiction to make any order it considers just: Court of Appeal Act, R.S.B.C. 199......
1 cases
-
Chamberlin v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia,
...that it constitutes an abuse of process. This Court has repeatedly affirmed this principle: see, e.g., Szopa v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 47 at para. 13. Furthermore, this Court has statutory jurisdiction to make any order it considers just: Court of Appeal Act, R.S.B.C. 199......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Yang v. Shi, 2022 BCCA 317 ' Summary Determinations At The Court Of Appeal
...allows a party to apply to strike part of a factum or raise a preliminary objection to an appeal. 3. Szopa v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 BCCA 47 at para. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about y......