T.D. Bank v. Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Danyliuk |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 285 |
| Docket Number | GBQ 568 of 2017 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 25 October 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
PRATTS WHOLESALE FOOD SERVICES LTD. operating as PRATTS FOOD SERVICE v. 101256697 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. operating as BUDDIES PIZZA & CONFECTIONARY, RONAK PATEL, PRIYANK PATEL,
...Co. v Lima, [1926] 4 DLR 48 (Sask KB); Richter v Capri Holdings Inc., 2001 SKQB 520, 214 Sask R 109; Toronto-Dominion Bank v Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285. This aspect was not considered by the Court of Appeal in its obiter statement in Collins, as that issue was not squarely before that court. [21......
-
INPUT CAPITAL CORP. v. 101181565 SASKATCHEWAN LTD., NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS (CANADA) INC. and LARRY PENNER ENTERPRISES INC., 2020 SKQB 130
...[24] Also see 101236168 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Harmon International Industries Inc., 2017 SKQB 349 and Toronto-Dominion Bank v Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285. 2. What order should be made in this case? [25] I first turn to a consideration of the Woodbine factors: 1. The security in this case appears to......
-
SYNERGY CREDIT UNION LTD. v. WEISBROD FARMS LTD. and KENNETH MICHAEL WEISBROD,
...applications. Subsequent encumbrancers have a right to redeem the mortgage. This principle is set out in Toronto-Dominion Bank v Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285 at paras [15] Rule 10-41 of The Queen’s Bench Rules requires that on an application for order n......
-
SCOTIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. JASON GARRY MCNAUGHTON AND TINA AVERY,
...In Toronto Dominion Bank v Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285, 40 CPC (8th) 145 [Tellez] an order nisi was granted with a 90 day redemption period; however, the evidence disclosed substantial payments were made after the date of the order nisi. In Tellez, Danyliuk J. referred to Rule 10-43(6) of The Que......
4 cases
-
PRATTS WHOLESALE FOOD SERVICES LTD. operating as PRATTS FOOD SERVICE v. 101256697 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. operating as BUDDIES PIZZA & CONFECTIONARY, RONAK PATEL, PRIYANK PATEL,
...Co. v Lima, [1926] 4 DLR 48 (Sask KB); Richter v Capri Holdings Inc., 2001 SKQB 520, 214 Sask R 109; Toronto-Dominion Bank v Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285. This aspect was not considered by the Court of Appeal in its obiter statement in Collins, as that issue was not squarely before that court. [21......
-
INPUT CAPITAL CORP. v. 101181565 SASKATCHEWAN LTD., NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS (CANADA) INC. and LARRY PENNER ENTERPRISES INC., 2020 SKQB 130
...[24] Also see 101236168 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Harmon International Industries Inc., 2017 SKQB 349 and Toronto-Dominion Bank v Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285. 2. What order should be made in this case? [25] I first turn to a consideration of the Woodbine factors: 1. The security in this case appears to......
-
SYNERGY CREDIT UNION LTD. v. WEISBROD FARMS LTD. and KENNETH MICHAEL WEISBROD,
...applications. Subsequent encumbrancers have a right to redeem the mortgage. This principle is set out in Toronto-Dominion Bank v Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285 at paras [15] Rule 10-41 of The Queen’s Bench Rules requires that on an application for order n......
-
SCOTIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. JASON GARRY MCNAUGHTON AND TINA AVERY,
...In Toronto Dominion Bank v Tellez, 2018 SKQB 285, 40 CPC (8th) 145 [Tellez] an order nisi was granted with a 90 day redemption period; however, the evidence disclosed substantial payments were made after the date of the order nisi. In Tellez, Danyliuk J. referred to Rule 10-43(6) of The Que......