TA v Alberta (Children's Services)
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice N.E. Devlin |
| Docket Number | 1701 04416 |
| Date | 07 February 2020 |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 97 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Hannam v Medicine Hat School District No. 76
...Insulation Group Canada Inc. v. Aluma Systems Inc. dismissal denied unreported denied 2019 ABQB 166 124 TA v. Alberta dismissal granted 2020 ABQB 97 125 Urban Square Holdings Ltd. v. Governali dismissal granted 2020 ABQB 240 126 von der Ohe v. Porsche Cars Canada Ltd. dismissal denied 2019 ......
-
SO YOU WANT TO IMPLEMENT UNDRIP.
...v The Queen, 2013 TCC 357; Laliberte v Canada (AG), 2019 FC766,aff don other grounds 2020 FCA 119; TAv Alberta (Children's Services), 2020 ABQB 97 (holding that UNDRIP is not a source of enforceable rights or obligations without statutory (13) Does the validity of treaties between the Crown......
-
IMPLEMENTING UNDRIP: AN ANALYSIS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA'S DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLESACT.
...HRC v Canada AG]. (116) See e.g. Snuneymuxw v Board of Education - School District #68,2014 BCSC 1173; TA v Alberta (Children's Services). 2020 ABQB 97. In this later case, Justice Devlin failed to engage with the question of whether provisions of the Declaration might represent customary i......
-
MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2022 ABPC 42
...in the notice itself, including the issue of standing. [217] In TA v Alberta (Children's Services), 2020 ABQB 97, the mothers had filed a civil claim naming numerous professionals in the child welfare system while her children were in the care of the Director. T......
2 cases
-
Hannam v Medicine Hat School District No. 76,
...Insulation Group Canada Inc. v. Aluma Systems Inc. dismissal denied unreported denied 2019 ABQB 166 124 TA v. Alberta dismissal granted 2020 ABQB 97 125 Urban Square Holdings Ltd. v. Governali dismissal granted 2020 ABQB 240 126 von der Ohe v. Porsche Cars Canada Ltd. dismissal denied 2019 ......
-
MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director), 2022 ABPC 42
...in the notice itself, including the issue of standing. [217] In TA v Alberta (Children's Services), 2020 ABQB 97, the mothers had filed a civil claim naming numerous professionals in the child welfare system while her children were in the care of the Director. T......
2 books & journal articles
-
SO YOU WANT TO IMPLEMENT UNDRIP.
...v The Queen, 2013 TCC 357; Laliberte v Canada (AG), 2019 FC766,aff don other grounds 2020 FCA 119; TAv Alberta (Children's Services), 2020 ABQB 97 (holding that UNDRIP is not a source of enforceable rights or obligations without statutory (13) Does the validity of treaties between the Crown......
-
IMPLEMENTING UNDRIP: AN ANALYSIS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA'S DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLESACT.
...HRC v Canada AG]. (116) See e.g. Snuneymuxw v Board of Education - School District #68,2014 BCSC 1173; TA v Alberta (Children's Services). 2020 ABQB 97. In this later case, Justice Devlin failed to engage with the question of whether provisions of the Declaration might represent customary i......