Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCCA 226
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 226 |
| Date | 31 July 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA46688; CA46711 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Star Energy Canada Inc. v Builders Energy Services Ltd,
...regardless of whether the undertaking has been incorporated into a court order: rule 10.52(3)(a)(vi), and see Taherkani v Este, 2020 BCCA 226 at paras 25 Where an undertaking involves a promise to pay money to a party, the Court has no power to revoke or vary it: Westminster Bank Ltd v Zhan......
-
Taherkhani v. Este,
...defraud him. k) On July 31, 2020, an application brought by Mehran in the Court of Appeal for contempt was dismissed (2020 BCCA 226); l) On July 8, 2021, I dismissed an application by Mina Francis in the Family Action to set aside the Pearlman......
-
2023 BCSC 95,
...with restraint and as a measure of “last resort”: Morasse v. Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at para. 21; Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCCA 226 at para. 32, citing Hokhold v. Gerbrandt, 2016 BCCA 6 at paras. 31–32. [29] The primary purpose of imposing a sanction for civil contem......
-
Maryoush v Ibrahim,
...with restraint and as a measure of “last resort”: Morasse v. Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at para. 21; Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCCA 226 at para. 32, citing Hokhold v. Gerbrandt, 2016 BCCA 6 at paras. 31–32. [29] The primary purpose of imposing a sanction for civil contem......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Taherkhani v. Este,
...defraud him. k) On July 31, 2020, an application brought by Mehran in the Court of Appeal for contempt was dismissed (2020 BCCA 226); l) On July 8, 2021, I dismissed an application by Mina Francis in the Family Action to set aside the Pearlman......
-
2023 BCSC 95,
...with restraint and as a measure of “last resort”: Morasse v. Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at para. 21; Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCCA 226 at para. 32, citing Hokhold v. Gerbrandt, 2016 BCCA 6 at paras. 31–32. [29] The primary purpose of imposing a sanction for civil contem......
-
Maryoush v Ibrahim,
...with restraint and as a measure of “last resort”: Morasse v. Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at para. 21; Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCCA 226 at para. 32, citing Hokhold v. Gerbrandt, 2016 BCCA 6 at paras. 31–32. [29] The primary purpose of imposing a sanction for civil contem......
-
Dempsey v Pagefreezer Software Inc.,
...compliance with court orders. At paras. 18–19 of his reasons he expressly referred to Carey at para. 36 and to Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCCA 226 at para. 32 which is to similar effect. He was also mindful of that guidance when he imposed a fine of $5,000 on Mr. Dempsey, despite oppos......
Request a trial to view additional results