Tamayo Valencia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1013
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1013 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 10 October 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Hernandez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1060
...of a decision constitutes a reviewable error (Akram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 143; Tamayo Valencia v Canada , 2018 FC 1013). The RPD’s possible misinterpretation of the father’s statement clearly tainted its assessment of both the statement itself, and more importantly......
-
Kanu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 674
...the RAD upheld the RPD’s credibility assessment. The Applicants point to Tamayo Valencia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1013 [Tamayo] at paras 22-25, in which Justice Gleeson found that the RPD made inconsistent credibility findings, as it was unclear which parts of ......
-
Kauhonina v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1300
...questions of mixed fact and law, and thus are subject to a reasonableness standard (Valencia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1013 at para 16). IV. i. State Protection [14] The Applicant argues that the Board’s conclusion of adequate state prot......
3 cases
-
Hernandez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1060
...of a decision constitutes a reviewable error (Akram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 143; Tamayo Valencia v Canada , 2018 FC 1013). The RPD’s possible misinterpretation of the father’s statement clearly tainted its assessment of both the statement itself, and more importantly......
-
Kanu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 674
...the RAD upheld the RPD’s credibility assessment. The Applicants point to Tamayo Valencia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1013 [Tamayo] at paras 22-25, in which Justice Gleeson found that the RPD made inconsistent credibility findings, as it was unclear which parts of ......
-
Kauhonina v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 1300
...questions of mixed fact and law, and thus are subject to a reasonableness standard (Valencia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1013 at para 16). IV. i. State Protection [14] The Applicant argues that the Board’s conclusion of adequate state prot......