Tanudjaja et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1878 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Lederer, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,COURTS |
| Date | 03 April 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
LET OUR LIVING TREE GROW: BEYOND NON-JUSTICIABILITY FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF WICKED PROBLEMS.
...Co v Nova Scotia (Speaker of the House of Assembly), [1993] 1 SCR 319 at 389. (80) See Tanudjaja v Attorney General (Canada), 2013 ONSC 1878 [Tanudjaja, ONSC], aff'd 2014 ONCA 852 [Tanudjaja, (81) Tanudjaja, ONCA, supra note 80 at para 37. (82) Ibid at para 86. (83) Ibid. (84) Ibid. at para......
-
Tanudjaja et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5410
...194. 3. R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. , 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45, at paras. 17-25. 4. Tanudjaja v. Attorney General (Canada), 2013 ONSC 1878. 5. Rules of Civil Procedure, supra , [fn. 2] at rule 21.02. 6. Fleet Street Financial Corp. v. Levinson, 31 C.P.C. (5th) 145 (Ont. S.C.J.......
-
Kelly et al. v. Ontario (Minister of Energy and Ontario Power Authority), [2013] O.A.C. Uned. 567
...for the proposition that Rule 13.01 should be interpreted narrowly: M. v. H. , paras. 30-33; Tanudjaja v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2013 ONSC 1878 (S.C.J.), at para. 10. Both of these cases involved public interest litigation, in which the proposed interveners were public interest organiz......
-
Chief Building Official v. Haastown Holdings,
...and the rule interpreted narrowly otherwise proceedings run the risk of becoming unwieldly: Tanudjaja v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 ONSC 1878. I [18] Discretionary factors to be considered in deciding whether to allow a non-party to intervene a......
3 cases
-
Tanudjaja et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5410
...194. 3. R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. , 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45, at paras. 17-25. 4. Tanudjaja v. Attorney General (Canada), 2013 ONSC 1878. 5. Rules of Civil Procedure, supra , [fn. 2] at rule 21.02. 6. Fleet Street Financial Corp. v. Levinson, 31 C.P.C. (5th) 145 (Ont. S.C.J.......
-
Kelly et al. v. Ontario (Minister of Energy and Ontario Power Authority), [2013] O.A.C. Uned. 567
...for the proposition that Rule 13.01 should be interpreted narrowly: M. v. H. , paras. 30-33; Tanudjaja v. Canada (Attorney General) , 2013 ONSC 1878 (S.C.J.), at para. 10. Both of these cases involved public interest litigation, in which the proposed interveners were public interest organiz......
-
Chief Building Official v. Haastown Holdings,
...and the rule interpreted narrowly otherwise proceedings run the risk of becoming unwieldly: Tanudjaja v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 ONSC 1878. I [18] Discretionary factors to be considered in deciding whether to allow a non-party to intervene a......
1 books & journal articles
-
LET OUR LIVING TREE GROW: BEYOND NON-JUSTICIABILITY FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF WICKED PROBLEMS.
...Co v Nova Scotia (Speaker of the House of Assembly), [1993] 1 SCR 319 at 389. (80) See Tanudjaja v Attorney General (Canada), 2013 ONSC 1878 [Tanudjaja, ONSC], aff'd 2014 ONCA 852 [Tanudjaja, (81) Tanudjaja, ONCA, supra note 80 at para 37. (82) Ibid at para 86. (83) Ibid. (84) Ibid. at para......