Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2017 FC 1100 |
| Date | 05 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23
...213; MiningWatch Canada v. Canada (Fisheries and Oceans), 2010 SCC 2, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 6; Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100, 15 C.E.L.R. (4th) 53; R. v. Morgentaler, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 463; Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia v. Bryden, [1899] A.C. 580; Quebec (Attor......
-
Power Workers’ Union v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 793
...the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Canadian Bill of Rights is correctness” (see also: Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100 at paras 49 and 54, affd 2019 FCA 320 at paras 19 and [47] I will follow this approach, as suggested by the FCA at paragraph 21 of Correctio......
-
THE UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE OF ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY: A SOLUTION TO THE PIPELINES PUZZLE?
...online: Government of Ontario [Ontario OIC] (challenging federal government's carbon tax); Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100; and Syncrude Canada Ltd v Attorney General of Canada, 2014 FC (119) Friends of the Oldman River Society v Canada (Minister of Transport), [19......
-
Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2019 FCA 320
...of both the Minister and the GIC were made without jurisdiction. [96] Having concluded in Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100 that the review process had been fair to the appellant, the judge summarily rejected this claim at paragraph 121: The GIC had jurisdiction to ......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Reference re Impact Assessment Act, 2023 SCC 23
...213; MiningWatch Canada v. Canada (Fisheries and Oceans), 2010 SCC 2, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 6; Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100, 15 C.E.L.R. (4th) 53; R. v. Morgentaler, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 463; Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia v. Bryden, [1899] A.C. 580; Quebec (Attor......
-
Power Workers’ Union v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 793
...the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Canadian Bill of Rights is correctness” (see also: Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100 at paras 49 and 54, affd 2019 FCA 320 at paras 19 and [47] I will follow this approach, as suggested by the FCA at paragraph 21 of Correctio......
-
Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2019 FCA 320
...of both the Minister and the GIC were made without jurisdiction. [96] Having concluded in Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100 that the review process had been fair to the appellant, the judge summarily rejected this claim at paragraph 121: The GIC had jurisdiction to ......
-
William v. British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 1425
...and the associated panel process were dismissed on December 5, 2017: Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1099 and 2017 FC 1100. TML has appealed these dismissals to the Federal Court of Appeal, and efforts are being made to have those appeals heard in October or November [......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
British Columbia Court Of Appeal Reaffirms Duty To Consult Not A Duty To Agree
...Group. Footnotes See [1] Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment). 2017 FC 1099and Taseko Mines Limited v. Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100 [2] Prophet River First Nation v. British Columbia (Environment), 2015 BCSC 1682 [Prophet River] [3] Prophet River at para The content of this ar......
-
The Maturation Of The Duty To Consult - Top Ten Developments Of 2017 In Canadian Aboriginal Law
...found here. Footnotes 2017 SCC 58. Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1099; Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100. See Tsilhqot'in Nation v Canada, 2014 SCC 44. Files A-6-18 and A-7-18. Procureur général de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador v Uashaunnuat (Innus d......
-
The maturation of the duty to consult: Top ten developments of 2017 in Canadian Aboriginal law
...process itself. 1. 2017 SCC 58. 2. Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1099; Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100. 3. See Tsilhqot’in Nation v Canada, 2014 SCC 44. 4. Files A-6-18 and A-7-18. 5. Procureur général de Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador v Uashaunnuat......
-
Federal Court Confirms Minimal To No Duty Of Procedural Fairness Owed To Proponents During Post-Hearing Crown Consultations
...until a later stage - had the potential to call into question the entire JRP process. Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100 In Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100 , (Taseko 2), Taseko challenged the Minister's and the federal cabinet's decisions th......
2 books & journal articles
-
THE UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE OF ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY: A SOLUTION TO THE PIPELINES PUZZLE?
...online: Government of Ontario [Ontario OIC] (challenging federal government's carbon tax); Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100; and Syncrude Canada Ltd v Attorney General of Canada, 2014 FC (119) Friends of the Oldman River Society v Canada (Minister of Transport), [19......
-
THE CRUDE POLITICS OF CARBON PRICING, PIPELINES, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
...operation of statutes enacted by governments at both levels" [Rogers Communication]. (106) Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2017 FC 1100 [Taseko Mines], The leading case on cooperative federalism is Canadian Western Bank v Alberta, 2007 SCC 22 [Canadian Western (107) Taseko Mine......