Tate v. Gueguegirre et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 720 (SC)

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeWhitaker, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Subject MatterEXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS,PRACTICE
Citation[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 720 (SC),2013 ONSC 720,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 720
Date27 February 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Paterson et al v. Pearson, 2016 ONSC 5620
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 20, 2016
    ...name="_ftn1" title="" id="_ftn1">[1] 17 E.T.R. (3d) 64. [2] 2010 ONSC 4487 [3] 2013 ONSC 720 (Sup. [4] Mr. Felker also provides costs on a substantial indemnity basis in his materials. [5]"font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> Mr. Gillespie says that the litigation was reasonably brought......
  • Seguin v. Pearson, 2017 ONSC 5620
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 16, 2018
    ...name="_ftn1" title>[1] 17 E.T.R. (3d) 64. [2] 2010 ONSC 4487 [3] 2013 ONSC 720 (Sup. [4] Mr. Felker also provides costs on a substantial indemnity basis in his materials. [5]Mr. Gillespie says that the litigation was reasonably brought. Although acknowledging the change in law post McDougal......
2 cases
  • Paterson et al v. Pearson, 2016 ONSC 5620
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 20, 2016
    ...name="_ftn1" title="" id="_ftn1">[1] 17 E.T.R. (3d) 64. [2] 2010 ONSC 4487 [3] 2013 ONSC 720 (Sup. [4] Mr. Felker also provides costs on a substantial indemnity basis in his materials. [5]"font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> Mr. Gillespie says that the litigation was reasonably brought......
  • Seguin v. Pearson, 2017 ONSC 5620
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 16, 2018
    ...name="_ftn1" title>[1] 17 E.T.R. (3d) 64. [2] 2010 ONSC 4487 [3] 2013 ONSC 720 (Sup. [4] Mr. Felker also provides costs on a substantial indemnity basis in his materials. [5]Mr. Gillespie says that the litigation was reasonably brought. Although acknowledging the change in law post McDougal......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT