Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 1192
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | LEDERER J. |
Date | 27 February 2020 |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Docket Number | CV-181819 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Flying E Ranche Ltd. v. Attorney General of Canada,
...as a whole, and not just some individual members of the Class or a segment of the Class: see, e.g., Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 1192 (“Taylor (ONSC)”), at para. 564, in which Lederer J. held that proximity as a common issue was not proved merely because ther......
-
Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General),
...appeal from the judgment of Justice Thomas R. Lederer of the Superior Court of Justice, dated February 27, 2020, with reasons reported at 2020 ONSC 1192. REASONS FOR [1] The appellant is the representative plaintiff in a class proceeding relating to defective medical devices certified by or......
-
Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General),
...and (i) any other matter relevant to the question of costs. [3] S.O. 1992, c. 6 at s. 31 [4] Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 1192 (CanLII) at para. [5] Ibid at para. 8 quoting from an Endorsement of Master MacLeod dated July 25, 2001 at para. 12. [6] Ibid at para. 65 q......
-
Taylor v Canada (Attorney General),
...appeal from the judgment of Justice Thomas R. Lederer of the Superior Court of Justice, dated February 27, 2020, with reasons reported at 2020 ONSC 1192. COSTS ENDORSEMENT 1 On December 22, 2022, we released reasons for decision dismissing the appeal and cross-appeal and invited submissions......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Flying E Ranche Ltd. v. Attorney General of Canada,
...as a whole, and not just some individual members of the Class or a segment of the Class: see, e.g., Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 1192 (“Taylor (ONSC)”), at para. 564, in which Lederer J. held that proximity as a common issue was not proved merely because ther......
-
Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General),
...appeal from the judgment of Justice Thomas R. Lederer of the Superior Court of Justice, dated February 27, 2020, with reasons reported at 2020 ONSC 1192. REASONS FOR [1] The appellant is the representative plaintiff in a class proceeding relating to defective medical devices certified by or......
-
Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General),
...and (i) any other matter relevant to the question of costs. [3] S.O. 1992, c. 6 at s. 31 [4] Taylor v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 1192 (CanLII) at para. [5] Ibid at para. 8 quoting from an Endorsement of Master MacLeod dated July 25, 2001 at para. 12. [6] Ibid at para. 65 q......
-
Taylor v Canada (Attorney General),
...appeal from the judgment of Justice Thomas R. Lederer of the Superior Court of Justice, dated February 27, 2020, with reasons reported at 2020 ONSC 1192. COSTS ENDORSEMENT 1 On December 22, 2022, we released reasons for decision dismissing the appeal and cross-appeal and invited submissions......
Request a trial to view additional results