The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation,, 2017 ONCA 85
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Weiler,Blair , van Rensburg |
Subject Matter | PRACTICE,LIBEL AND SLANDER |
Citation | 2017 ONCA 85 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Docket Number | C61665 |
Date | 03 February 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 practice notes
-
REED v. DOBSON,
...and place the defamatory words were made, if possible. See, for example: Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v Veritas Investment Research Corp., 2017 ONCA 85 at para 23, 136 OR (3d) 23 [229] ......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 6, 2022 ' September 9, 2022)
...Pleadings, Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc., [1990], 2 S.C.R. 959, The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85, Magnotta [Winery Ltd. v. Ziraldo, [1995] O.R. No. (3d) 575 (Ont. Gen. Div.)], Frank v. Legate, 2015 ONCA 631, Resolute Forest Products Inc. v......
-
Madadi v. British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 1891
...(1999), 181 D.L.R. (4th) 83 at para. 24 (M.B.C.A.); The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85 at paras. [65] More recently, courts have applied greater flexibility when analysing defamation pleadings, at least in the early stages of a proceedin......
-
Huff v Zuk, 2021 ABCA 60
...facts; such discretionary decisions attract appellate deference: The Catalyst Capital Group Inc v Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85 at paras [23] Whether a statement is capable of defamatory meaning is a question of law reviewed ......
Request a trial to view additional results
29 cases
-
REED v. DOBSON,
...and place the defamatory words were made, if possible. See, for example: Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v Veritas Investment Research Corp., 2017 ONCA 85 at para 23, 136 OR (3d) 23 [229] ......
-
Madadi v. British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 1891
...(1999), 181 D.L.R. (4th) 83 at para. 24 (M.B.C.A.); The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85 at paras. [65] More recently, courts have applied greater flexibility when analysing defamation pleadings, at least in the early stages of a proceedin......
-
Huff v Zuk, 2021 ABCA 60
...facts; such discretionary decisions attract appellate deference: The Catalyst Capital Group Inc v Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85 at paras [23] Whether a statement is capable of defamatory meaning is a question of law reviewed ......
-
BTA REAL ESTATE GROUP INC. v. KAISS,
...the defamatory words were made, if possible. See, for example: Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v Veritas Investment Research Corp., 2017 ONCA 85 at para 23, 136 OR (3d) [229] In Hope, our Court of Appeal at para. 24, accepted that the proper approach for testing a ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 6, 2022 ' September 9, 2022)
...Pleadings, Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc., [1990], 2 S.C.R. 959, The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85, Magnotta [Winery Ltd. v. Ziraldo, [1995] O.R. No. (3d) 575 (Ont. Gen. Div.)], Frank v. Legate, 2015 ONCA 631, Resolute Forest Products Inc. v......
-
Getting The "gist" Of It: Ontario Court Of Appeal Applies Modern, Flexible Approach To Defamation And Civil Conspiracy Pleadings
...543, para. 90. 8. PMC York, 2022 ONCA 635, para. 38 citing The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85, 136 O.R. (3d) 23, para. 9. PMC York, 2022 ONCA 635, para. 40. 10. PMC York, 2022 ONCA 635, para. 44. The content of this article is intended t......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 30 February 3, 2017)
...Accordingly, the court was unable to make the order requested. The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85 [Weiler, Blair and van Rensburg R. DiPucchio and A. Winton, for the appellants B. Morrison, for the respondent Veritas Investment Research ......