The reversing influence of involvement on the framing effect: The role of emotions and negativity

AuthorNajam U. Saqib
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1286
Published date01 September 2014
Date01 September 2014
The reversing influence of involvement on the
framing effect: The role of emotions and negativity
Najam U. Saqib
Qatar University
Abstract
The Asian disease problem (ADP), as a demonstration of the
framing effect, revealed a preference reversal between
options perceived as risky and those perceived as certain.
This research identif‌ies individualsinvolvement level as a
moderator of the framing effect. The framing effect in the
ADP consisted of emotional choice outcomes regarding
human lives. Two studies in this paper demonstrate that
when based on emotional choices, the framing effect in high
involvement conditions increases in size. Interestingly, this
inf‌luence of involvement reverses when the framing effect
is based on rational choices. The studies reveal that the
negativity invoked by the certain loss option is instrumental
in the underlying mechanism of the risky choice framing
effect, such as that demonstrated by the ADP. Copyright ©
2014 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: framing effect, involvement, negativity, emotions,
risky choices
Résume
En tant que manifestation de leffet de formulation, lAsian
disease problem (ADP) a mis en évidence une inversion de
préférences entre les options perçues comme risquées et les
options perçues comme certaines. Dans cette étude, le niveau
dimplication des personnes physiques est considéré comme un
modérateur de leffet de formulation. Dans lADP, leffet de
formulation ne comprenait que les effets du choix émotionnel
sur les vies humaines. Deux études contenues dans cet article
montrent que lorsque leffet de formulation est basé sur des choix
émotionnels, sa taille augmente en cas de grande implication.
Curieusement, linf‌luence de limplication est inversée lorsque
leffet de formulation sappuie sur des choix rationnels. Daprès
nos études, la négativité suscitée par loption dune perte certaine
joue un rôle important dans le mécanisme qui sous-tend leffet de
formulation de choix risqué, comme la démontré lADP.
Copyright © 2014 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés : effet de formulation, implication, négativité,
émotions, choix risqué
Over the past several decades, framing effects have
received substantial attention from researchers in disciplines as
diverse as psychology, economics, marketing, f‌inance, and man-
agement (Duhachek, Agarwal, & Han, 2012; Kühberger, 1998;
Lawson & Lawson, 2009; McElroy & Seta, 2003; Seo,
Goldfarb, & Barrett, 2010). Different types of framing effects
such as goal framing, attribute framing, and risky choice framing
(Levin, Schneider, & Gaeth, 1998) have been identif‌ied in the
literature. Most illustrations of framing effects are based on a
manipulation of frame valence wherein the frame presents the
same information either in a positive or a negative frame. These
different types of framing effects are treated as a similar set of
phenomena explained by prospect theory (Kahneman &
Tversky, 1979). In their seminal work, Tversky and Kahneman
(1981) provided a demonstration of framing effects involving
risky and certain choices with an experiment involving the hy-
pothetical Asian disease problem (ADP) (Kahneman &
Tversky, 1979; Appendix 1 on ADP available upon request).
The results of this experiment show that when outcomes are
framed positively, certain options are preferred. In contrast, when
outcomes are framed negatively, risky options are preferred.
A large body of research has investigated framing
effects and found them to be robust and consistent
(Kühberger, 1998; Levin et al., 1998). In fact, framing effect
is known to be one of the most striking biases that lead man-
agers to reverse their preferences based on information that
normatively should not affect their behaviour (Bazerman &
Moore, 2009). Thus, the study of framing effects in the con-
text of a business is relevant to managerial decisions that can
be framed positively versus negatively. For instance, a man-
ager may see a potential merger decision either as a loss of a
once-successful business or as a gain that would keep the
business identity alive. A consistent view on the inf‌luence
of framing effects was proffered on adaption of best prac-
tices in organizations (Smith, Stone, Kisamore, & Jawahar,
This research was partly conducted while the author was faculty at Ryerson
University, Toronto, Canada. The research support provided by Ryerson
University Faculty Grant is greatly appreciated.
Please address correspondence to: Najam U. Saqib, Marketing Department,
College of Business & Economics, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha,
Qatar. Email: najam.saqib@qu.edu.qa
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de ladministration
31: 187199 (2014)
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1286
Can J Adm Sci
31(3), 187199 (2014)Copyright © 2014 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 187

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT