The Role of Firms in Resilient Systems: A Multi‐Level Framework
Date | 01 June 2019 |
Published date | 01 June 2019 |
Author | Brent McKnight |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1490 |
The Role of Firms in Resilient Systems: A
Multi-Level Framework
Brent McKnight*
McMaster University
Abstract
In this paper, we articulate a multi-level resilience-based
framework explaining how firms facilitate stronger system-
level resilience. The framework stresses the importance of
firm interdependence, describing how pooled versus sequen-
tial/reciprocal patterns of interdependence influence the re-
silience antecedents of diversity, slack, and redundancy. We
argue that the inter-firm practices of self-governance and
supply chain collaboration function to maintain resilience
antecedents at more moderate and effective levels. This work
builds on prior resilience research that has remained fo-
cused on either firm or system levels of analysis by stressing
the value of firm interdependence as an important contin-
gency for effective system resilience. Copyright © 2018
ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: resilience, sustainability, multi-level, system-
level, theory
Résumé
Dans le présent article, nous présentons un cadre à
plusieurs niveaux fondé sur la résilience qui explique com-
ment les entreprises favorisent une résilience accrue au
niveau du système. Le cadre souligne l’importance de
l’interdépendance des entreprises, en décrivant comment
contrairement aux modèles séquentiels/réciproques les
modèles d’interdépendance regroupés influencent les anté-
cédents de résilience de la diversité, du relâchement et
de la redondance. Nous soutenons que les pratiques
interentreprises d’autogouvernance et de collaboration
dans la chaîne d’approvisionnement ont pour fonction de
maintenir les antécédents de résilience à des niveaux plus
modérés et efficaces. L’étude s’appuie sur des recherches
antérieures sur la résilience, qui sont demeurées axées
sur les niveaux d’analyse des entreprises ou des systèmes,
en soulignant la valeur de l’interdépendance des
entreprises en tant qu’élément important de la résilience
des systèmes. Copyright © 2018 ASAC. Published by John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés: résilience, durabilité, multi-niveaux, niveau
systémique, théorie
Introduction
In this paper we are interested in the system-level sus-
tainability-related consequences of firm-level action. By sys-
tem-level we mean the network of interacting agents that
exist at the level of industries and supply chains. We make
use of a definition of sustainability that draws on resilience,
which is the ability to absorb disturbances, such as those
from ecological and social pressure, without forcing dra-
matic changes (Holling, 1973; Walker, Holling, Carpenter,
& Kinzig, 2004). Resilience captures the long-lived and
flourishing aspects of sustainable development and lends
itself well to the discussion of sustainability in the context
of systems (Ehrenfeld, 2000).
The pursuit of sustainable development is an inherently
multi-level endeavour in that, while the object of sustainable
development exists at the level of economies, ecologies, and
societies, human activity deteriorating or ameliorating that
sustainability occurs at lower levels of analysis (Starik &
Rands, 1995; Starik & Kanashiro, 2013; Marcus, Kurucz,
& Colbert, 2010). However, organizational research on sus-
tainability often theorizes at the level of the firm (Harrison &
Wick, 2014). For instance, organizational scholars have ex-
plored the relationship between a firm’s socially or environ-
mentally focused activities and firm performance (see Griffin
& Mahon, 1997; Margolis, Elfenbein, & Walsh, 2009), in-
vestigated how firms manage to balance the varying interests
of different stakeholders (see Mitchell, Agle, & Wood,
1997), and studied firm-level efforts to improve eco-
*Please address correspondence to: Brent McKnight, McMaster University,
DeGroote School of Business, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario,
L8S 4L8, Canada. Email: bmcknight@mcmaster.ca
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de l’administration
36: 221–230 (2019)
Published online 15 April 2018 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1490
Can J Adm Sci
36(2), 221–230 (2019)Copyright © 2018 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 221
To continue reading
Request your trial