The Russia Federation v. Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Penny J. |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 7558 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CV-17-11772-CL |
| Date | 13 December 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (FEBRUARY 1 – 5, 2021)
...Commercial Arbitration, arts. 16 and 34, United Mexican States v. Cargill, Inc., 2011 ONCA 622, The Russia Federation v. Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558 Pearce v. Canada (Staff of the Non-Public Funds, Canadian Forces), 2021 ONCA 65 Keywords: Labour and Employment Law, Statutory Interpretat......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 1 ' 5, 2021)
...Commercial Arbitration, arts. 16 and 34, United Mexican States v. Cargill, Inc., 2011 ONCA 622, The Russia Federation v. Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558 Pearce v. Canada (Staff of the Non-Public Funds, Canadian Forces), 2021 ONCA 65 Keywords: Labour and Employment Law, Statutory Interpretat......
-
The Review of International Commercial Arbitral Awards and the New York Convention: Breaking the Link to Administrative Law.
...an award made in Washington, DC, under the bilateral investment treaty between Canada and Venezuela); Russia Federation v Luxtona Ltd, 2019 ONSC 7558, leave to appeal granted, 2020 ONSC 4668 (whether fresh evidence can be admitted in an application to set aside an interim award made by a tr......
-
The Russian Federation v. Luxtona Limited,
...before the tribunal. This is an appeal from the interlocutory decision of Penny J. declining to admit the Russian Federation’s evidence (2019 ONSC 7558). Background [2] The respondent, Luxtona, is a former shareholder of Yukos (an energy company based in Russia). It alleges that the appella......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
The Russian Federation v. Luxtona Limited,
...before the tribunal. This is an appeal from the interlocutory decision of Penny J. declining to admit the Russian Federation’s evidence (2019 ONSC 7558). Background [2] The respondent, Luxtona, is a former shareholder of Yukos (an energy company based in Russia). It alleges that the appella......
-
United Mexican States v. Burr,
...submissions to the application judge, Mexico’s counsel also invoked the decision of Penny J. in The Russia Federation v. Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558. That ruling concerned the admissibility of fresh evidence in an application under art. 16 of the Model Law. Penny J. cited art. 34 in his......
-
Vento Motorcycles, Inc. v. United Mexican States,
...of its position that the Palmer test applies, Mexico relies on the decision of Justice Penny in The Russia Federation v. Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558 (“Russia Federation”). In that case, Russia applied to set aside an interim arbitral award on the ground that the trib......
4 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (FEBRUARY 1 – 5, 2021)
...Commercial Arbitration, arts. 16 and 34, United Mexican States v. Cargill, Inc., 2011 ONCA 622, The Russia Federation v. Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558 Pearce v. Canada (Staff of the Non-Public Funds, Canadian Forces), 2021 ONCA 65 Keywords: Labour and Employment Law, Statutory Interpretat......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 1 ' 5, 2021)
...Commercial Arbitration, arts. 16 and 34, United Mexican States v. Cargill, Inc., 2011 ONCA 622, The Russia Federation v. Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558 Pearce v. Canada (Staff of the Non-Public Funds, Canadian Forces), 2021 ONCA 65 Keywords: Labour and Employment Law, Statutory Interpretat......
-
Divided No Longer: Admissibility Of New Evidence On Appeals From UNCITRAL Arbitrations Determined According To Domestic Law
...Penny's ruling in The Russia Federation v Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558 provides guidance on two elements of international arbitration First, parties challenging an arbitral tribunal's award on jurisdiction under Articles 16 and 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arb......
-
The Pendulum Swings: Parties To UNCITRAL Arbitrations Can Tender New Evidence As Of Right On Jurisdictional Challenges
...that new evidence should only be admitted on appeal according to a four-part test. 2 The Russian Federation v Luxtona Limited, 2019 ONSC 7558. 3 Luxtona 2021 at para 10. 4 Model Law at art 16 (emphasis in original). 5 ICAA at s 11(1) (emphasis in original) 6 Luxtona 2021 at para 22. 7 Luxto......
1 books & journal articles
-
The Review of International Commercial Arbitral Awards and the New York Convention: Breaking the Link to Administrative Law.
...an award made in Washington, DC, under the bilateral investment treaty between Canada and Venezuela); Russia Federation v Luxtona Ltd, 2019 ONSC 7558, leave to appeal granted, 2020 ONSC 4668 (whether fresh evidence can be admitted in an application to set aside an interim award made by a tr......