Thiemer Estate v. Schlappner et al.

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeDardi, J.
Citation[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 629 (SC),2012 BCSC 629,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 629
Date01 May 2012
Subject MatterSTATUTES,WILLS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • Lubberts Estate, Re, (2014) 577 A.R. 110
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 25, 2014
    ...234; 61 A.P.R. 234 (Nfld. T.D.), refd to. [para. 59, footnote 32]. Thiemer Estate v. Schlappner et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 629; 2012 BCSC 629, refd to. [para. 59, footnote Bergey Estate, Re (1995), 103 Man.R.(2d) 202 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 59, footnote 32]. Bergey v. Cassel - see Bergey......
  • Kenoras v. Smith
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 2, 2017
    ...[1979] S.J. No. 428, 106 D.L.R. (3d) 360 (C.A.). … [Emphasis in original.] [54] Rondel was followed in Thiemer Estate v. Schlappner, 2012 BCSC 629 [Thiemer Estate]. There, Dardi J. [45] In construing a will, the objective of the court is to ascertain the intention of the testator as express......
  • Killam v. Killam
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 2, 2017
    ...v. Sacher, [1979] S.J. No. 428, 106 D.L.R. (3d) 360 (C.A.). … [Emphasis added.] [54] Rondel was followed in Thiemer Estate v. Schlappner, 2012 BCSC 629 [Thiemer Estate]. There, Dardi J. [45] In construing a will, the objective of the court is to ascertain the intention of the testator as ex......
  • Corbin v The Shepherds' Trust
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 19, 2024
    ...of British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Alberta that suggests that “money” can be construed synonymously with “residue”. In Thiemer Estate, 2012 BCSC 629, 2012 CarswellBC 1210, the British Columbia Supreme Court suggested that the construction of the word “money” might depend on whether there......
  • Get Started for Free
25 cases
  • Lubberts Estate, Re, (2014) 577 A.R. 110
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 25, 2014
    ...234; 61 A.P.R. 234 (Nfld. T.D.), refd to. [para. 59, footnote 32]. Thiemer Estate v. Schlappner et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 629; 2012 BCSC 629, refd to. [para. 59, footnote Bergey Estate, Re (1995), 103 Man.R.(2d) 202 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 59, footnote 32]. Bergey v. Cassel - see Bergey......
  • Kenoras v. Smith
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 2, 2017
    ...[1979] S.J. No. 428, 106 D.L.R. (3d) 360 (C.A.). … [Emphasis in original.] [54] Rondel was followed in Thiemer Estate v. Schlappner, 2012 BCSC 629 [Thiemer Estate]. There, Dardi J. [45] In construing a will, the objective of the court is to ascertain the intention of the testator as express......
  • Killam v. Killam
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 2, 2017
    ...v. Sacher, [1979] S.J. No. 428, 106 D.L.R. (3d) 360 (C.A.). … [Emphasis added.] [54] Rondel was followed in Thiemer Estate v. Schlappner, 2012 BCSC 629 [Thiemer Estate]. There, Dardi J. [45] In construing a will, the objective of the court is to ascertain the intention of the testator as ex......
  • Corbin v The Shepherds' Trust
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 19, 2024
    ...of British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Alberta that suggests that “money” can be construed synonymously with “residue”. In Thiemer Estate, 2012 BCSC 629, 2012 CarswellBC 1210, the British Columbia Supreme Court suggested that the construction of the word “money” might depend on whether there......
  • Get Started for Free