Thind v. Mole,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeJackson
Docket NumberM1710474; M201202
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date28 October 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • 2023 BCSC 1042,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...891 at para. 124; Warick v. Diwell, 2017 BCSC 68 at paras. 202–209, aff'd 2018 BCCA 53; Pololos at para. 144; Thind v. Mole, 2022 BCSC 1895 at para. 63. Medically justified means something less than medical necessity, and requires only some evidence the expense claimed is direct......
  • Oh v Fang,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 19, 2023
    ...891 at para. 124; Warick v. Diwell, 2017 BCSC 68 at paras. 202–209, aff'd 2018 BCCA 53; Pololos at para. 144; Thind v. Mole, 2022 BCSC 1895 at para. 63. Medically justified means something less than medical necessity, and requires only some evidence the expense claimed is direct......
2 cases
  • 2023 BCSC 1042,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...891 at para. 124; Warick v. Diwell, 2017 BCSC 68 at paras. 202–209, aff'd 2018 BCCA 53; Pololos at para. 144; Thind v. Mole, 2022 BCSC 1895 at para. 63. Medically justified means something less than medical necessity, and requires only some evidence the expense claimed is direct......
  • Oh v Fang,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 19, 2023
    ...891 at para. 124; Warick v. Diwell, 2017 BCSC 68 at paras. 202–209, aff'd 2018 BCCA 53; Pololos at para. 144; Thind v. Mole, 2022 BCSC 1895 at para. 63. Medically justified means something less than medical necessity, and requires only some evidence the expense claimed is direct......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT