Thistle v. Schumilas, 2020 ONCA 88
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Watt, Hourigan and Trotter JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 88 |
| Date | 06 February 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | C66432 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 3 February 7, 2020)
...Lawyer v. Balev, 2018 SCC 16, H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 25, Salomon v. Matte‑Thompson, 2019 SCC 14 Thistle v. Schumilas, 2020 ONCA 88 Keywords: Torts, Professional Negligence, Insurance Brokers, Life Insurance, Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Property of Bankrupt, Choses in Act......
-
1159337 Ontario Ltd. v. Saplys,
...expiration of the limitation period if the party did not seek the order before the expiry of the limitation period: Thistle v Schumilas, 2020 ONCA 88, 442 D.L.R. (4th) 339, at paras. 25 and 31. [15] None of the cases relied on by the appellants deal......
-
Norman Towing v. Riordan Leasing Inc.,
...[40] In support of this position, the Plaintiffs point to the decisions in both Thistle v.Schumilas 2020 ONCA 88 and Douglas v. Stan Fergusson Fuels Ltd. 2018 ONCA 192. The Plaintiffs rely on the following passage at paragraph 25 of [25] ......
-
Ekarte v. GUPM,
...to make a nunc pro tunc order if the party did not seek an order before the relevant limitation period expired: Thistle v. Schumilas, 2020 ONCA 88; and 1186708 Ontario Inc. v. Gerstein, 2017 ONSC 1217. The authority to add a party at any stage of a proceeding does not apply to extend a limi......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
1159337 Ontario Ltd. v. Saplys,
...expiration of the limitation period if the party did not seek the order before the expiry of the limitation period: Thistle v Schumilas, 2020 ONCA 88, 442 D.L.R. (4th) 339, at paras. 25 and 31. [15] None of the cases relied on by the appellants deal......
-
Ekarte v. GUPM,
...to make a nunc pro tunc order if the party did not seek an order before the relevant limitation period expired: Thistle v. Schumilas, 2020 ONCA 88; and 1186708 Ontario Inc. v. Gerstein, 2017 ONSC 1217. The authority to add a party at any stage of a proceeding does not apply to extend a limi......
-
Norman Towing v. Riordan Leasing Inc.,
...[40] In support of this position, the Plaintiffs point to the decisions in both Thistle v.Schumilas 2020 ONCA 88 and Douglas v. Stan Fergusson Fuels Ltd. 2018 ONCA 192. The Plaintiffs rely on the following passage at paragraph 25 of [25] ......
-
Carillion Canada Holdings Inc. et al. (Re),
...(at paras. 103-104). [38] The Court of Appeal’s decision in Thistle v. Schumilas, 2020 ONCA 88, 442 D.L.R. (4th) 339, leave to appeal to S.C.C. ref’d, 2020 CanLII 50444, is also instructive. In Thistle, an undischarged bankrupt sued hi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 3 February 7, 2020)
...Lawyer v. Balev, 2018 SCC 16, H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 25, Salomon v. Matte‑Thompson, 2019 SCC 14 Thistle v. Schumilas, 2020 ONCA 88 Keywords: Torts, Professional Negligence, Insurance Brokers, Life Insurance, Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Property of Bankrupt, Choses in Act......