Thoreson v Alberta (Infrastructure)
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Myra Bielby,The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 146 |
| Date | 15 April 2020 |
| Docket Number | 1901-0052-AC |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
Landry v. Aurora Cannabis, Inc.
...to balance many competing factors: Waquan v Canada, 2004 ABCA 279, para 10, 33 Alta LR (4th) 231; Thoreson v Alberta (Infrastructure), 2020 ABCA 146, para [21] The determination on whether a limitation period has expired, absent legal error, is a qu......
-
Ian Dmytriw et al v Jonah NK Odim et al
...correctness (Ro-Dar Contracting Ltd v Verbeek Sand & Gravel Inc, 2016 ABCA 123 at para 11; and Thoreson v Alberta (Infrastructure), 2020 ABCA 146 at para Application of the Former or the Current Rule [45] In deciding whether the former or current rule applied, the motion judge correctly......
-
R. v. Cheema
...Charter rights: R v Huynh, 2008 ABQB 464, at paras 47-48; R v Nguyen, 2008 ABQB 721, at paras 296-298, aff’d on other grounds, 2020 ABCA 146; R v Croft, 2013 ABQB 716, at paras 20-21. [46] In Croft, J Burrows wrote: “[i]t would be entirely inconsistent with the individual and personal natur......
-
R v Cheema
...Charter rights: R v Huynh, 2008 ABQB 464, at paras 47–48; R v Nguyen, 2008 ABQB 721, at paras 296–298, aff'd on other grounds, 2020 ABCA 146; R v Croft, 2013 ABQB 716, at paras 46 In Croft, J Burrows wrote: “[i]t would be entirely inconsistent with the individual and personal nature of Char......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
Landry v. Aurora Cannabis, Inc.
...to balance many competing factors: Waquan v Canada, 2004 ABCA 279, para 10, 33 Alta LR (4th) 231; Thoreson v Alberta (Infrastructure), 2020 ABCA 146, para [21] The determination on whether a limitation period has expired, absent legal error, is a qu......
-
Ian Dmytriw et al v Jonah NK Odim et al
...correctness (Ro-Dar Contracting Ltd v Verbeek Sand & Gravel Inc, 2016 ABCA 123 at para 11; and Thoreson v Alberta (Infrastructure), 2020 ABCA 146 at para Application of the Former or the Current Rule [45] In deciding whether the former or current rule applied, the motion judge correctly......
-
R. v. Cheema
...Charter rights: R v Huynh, 2008 ABQB 464, at paras 47-48; R v Nguyen, 2008 ABQB 721, at paras 296-298, aff’d on other grounds, 2020 ABCA 146; R v Croft, 2013 ABQB 716, at paras 20-21. [46] In Croft, J Burrows wrote: “[i]t would be entirely inconsistent with the individual and personal natur......
-
R v Cheema
...Charter rights: R v Huynh, 2008 ABQB 464, at paras 47–48; R v Nguyen, 2008 ABQB 721, at paras 296–298, aff'd on other grounds, 2020 ABCA 146; R v Croft, 2013 ABQB 716, at paras 46 In Croft, J Burrows wrote: “[i]t would be entirely inconsistent with the individual and personal nature of Char......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Expropriation Law 2020: A Year In Review - 16 February 2021
...MRI Ltd., 2020 ABLCB 3 (CanLII) Edmonton (City) v Autobuy Leasing Corp., 2020 ABLCB 4 (CanLII) Thoreson v Alberta (Infrastructure), 2020 ABCA 146 Section 29 of Alberta's Expropriation Act establishes an expropriated landowner's right to a determination of compensation. Subsection 29(1) prov......
