Thorogood v. Roberts, 2014 BCSC 2213
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Subject Matter | EVIDENCE,DAMAGES,PRACTICE,DAMAGE AWARDS |
| Citation | 2014 BCSC 2213,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2213 (SC Reg.),[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2213 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 27 November 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Berard v Robinson, 2019 BCSC 502
...[80] In considering Mr. Spence's accounts, I am assisted by the decision of District Registrar Nielsen in Thorogood v. Roberts, 2014 BCSC 2213, where at para. 63, he writes: [63] The correct factual information was in the plaintiff's possession, or reasonably available to him. The......
-
Grady v. Riviere, 2018 BCSC 1103
...a disbursement was necessary or proper is when the disbursement was incurred not with the benefit of hindsight (Thorogood v. Roberts, 2014 BCSC 2213 citing Van Daele v. Van Daele, [1983] B.C.J. No. 58. The assessing officer’s role is not to step into the shoes of the trier of fact or second......
2 cases
-
Berard v Robinson, 2019 BCSC 502
...[80] In considering Mr. Spence's accounts, I am assisted by the decision of District Registrar Nielsen in Thorogood v. Roberts, 2014 BCSC 2213, where at para. 63, he writes: [63] The correct factual information was in the plaintiff's possession, or reasonably available to him. The......
-
Grady v. Riviere, 2018 BCSC 1103
...a disbursement was necessary or proper is when the disbursement was incurred not with the benefit of hindsight (Thorogood v. Roberts, 2014 BCSC 2213 citing Van Daele v. Van Daele, [1983] B.C.J. No. 58. The assessing officer’s role is not to step into the shoes of the trier of fact or second......