Tianjin Dinghui Hongjun Equity Investment Partnership v. Du
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | KIMMEL |
| Citation | 2023 ONSC 1808 |
| Date | 20 March 2023 |
| Docket Number | CV-22-00677226-00CL |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Medivolve Inc. v. JSC Chukotka Mining and Geological Company
...added] [50] Second, both parties refer to the decision of Kimmel J. in Tianjin v. Du, 2023 ONSC 1808, although they have put forward differing interpretations of that decision. I note that, in that case and in the present case, the moving part......
-
China Yantai Friction Co. Ltd. v. Novalex Inc.
...D to the Jan.12 Zhang affidavit) should be struck out. Relying on Tianjin Dinghui Hongjun Equity Investment Partnership v. Du, 2023 ONSC 1808 and United States v. Whyte, 2016 ONCA 624, the respondent argues that the respondent’s affidavits constitute “fresh evidence” and are inadmissi......
-
Ontario Superior Court Reinforces The Importance Of Proper Notice When Recognizing And Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Award
...will generally be concerned with reviewing the underlying process to confirm notice and the opportunity to participate. Footnotes 1 2023 ONSC 1808 at para 2 2023 ONSC 1808 at para 116 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice......
1 cases
-
Medivolve Inc. v JSC Chukotka Mining and Geological Company
...it cannot be condoned under Ontario law. [Italics added] 50 Second, both parties refer to the decision of Kimmel J. in Tianjin v. Du, 2023 ONSC 1808, although they have put forward differing interpretations of that decision. I note that, in that case and in the present case, the moving part......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Superior Court Reinforces The Importance Of Proper Notice When Recognizing And Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Award
...will generally be concerned with reviewing the underlying process to confirm notice and the opportunity to participate. Footnotes 1 2023 ONSC 1808 at para 2 2023 ONSC 1808 at para 116 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice......