Ting v Ting,
| Judge | Harris |
| Citation | 2022 ABQB 229 |
| Docket Number | 4803 188092 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 25 March 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Lemay v Lemay,
...50 at paras 51-53; JMM v TLG, 2019 ABQB 81 at para 18. These decisions predate the 2019 amendments to the Divorce Act. 14 In Ting v Ting, 2022 ABQB 229, affirmed 2023 ABCA 9, Justice Harris dealt with the question of whether parenting or mobility should be dealt with first, where there was ......
-
Potts v Marschlik,
...probabilities: ibid. para 61. E. Order of Analysis 101 This case requires me to consider both parenting and mobility. As in Ting v Ting, 2022 ABQB 229, parenting should be determined before mobility: para 187. However, in determining the best parenting arrangement for W's interest, I c......
-
Ting v Ting,
...In the Court of Appeal of Alberta Appeal from the Decision by The Honourable Justice L.K. Harris Dated the 25th day of March, 2022 ( 2022 ABQB 229, Docket: 4803 188092) Appearances: S.M. Schaefer for the L.H. Bruyer for the Appellant Memorandum of Judgment Regarding Costs I. Overview 1 This......
-
2023 ABCA 9,
...In the Court of Appeal of Alberta Appeal from the Decision by The Honourable Justice L.K. Harris Dated the 25th day of March, 2022 ( 2022 ABQB 229, Docket: 4803 188092) Appearances: S.M. Schaefer for the L.H. Bruyer for the Appellant Memorandum of Judgment Regarding Costs I. Overview 1 This......
4 cases
-
Lemay v Lemay,
...50 at paras 51-53; JMM v TLG, 2019 ABQB 81 at para 18. These decisions predate the 2019 amendments to the Divorce Act. 14 In Ting v Ting, 2022 ABQB 229, affirmed 2023 ABCA 9, Justice Harris dealt with the question of whether parenting or mobility should be dealt with first, where there was ......
-
Potts v Marschlik,
...probabilities: ibid. para 61. E. Order of Analysis 101 This case requires me to consider both parenting and mobility. As in Ting v Ting, 2022 ABQB 229, parenting should be determined before mobility: para 187. However, in determining the best parenting arrangement for W's interest, I c......
-
Ting v Ting,
...In the Court of Appeal of Alberta Appeal from the Decision by The Honourable Justice L.K. Harris Dated the 25th day of March, 2022 ( 2022 ABQB 229, Docket: 4803 188092) Appearances: S.M. Schaefer for the L.H. Bruyer for the Appellant Memorandum of Judgment Regarding Costs I. Overview 1 This......
-
2023 ABCA 9,
...In the Court of Appeal of Alberta Appeal from the Decision by The Honourable Justice L.K. Harris Dated the 25th day of March, 2022 ( 2022 ABQB 229, Docket: 4803 188092) Appearances: S.M. Schaefer for the L.H. Bruyer for the Appellant Memorandum of Judgment Regarding Costs I. Overview 1 This......