Tokai of Canada Ltd v. Kingsford Products Company, LLC,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 FC 782 |
| Citation | 2021 FC 782 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 23 July 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Tweak-D Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 238
...actual use: McDowell v. Laverana GmbH & Co. KG, 2017 FC 327 at paras. 42-46; Tokai of Canada Ltd. v. Kingsford Products Company, LLC, 2021 FC 782 at para. 56; Puma at para. 48. Here, there were only four relevant registrations—TRIBAL, TRIBAL INDULGENCES, URBAN: TRIBE, and TRIBE&#......
-
Haida Tourism Partnership D.B.A. West Coast Resorts v. The Ship-source Oil Pollution Fund, 2024 FC 439
...standard applies no deference to the underlying decision-maker (Clorox at para 23; Tokai of Canada Ltd v Kingsford Products Company, LLC, 2021 FC 782 at para [33] Relying on Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd v Canada, 2016 FCA 130 [Agnico-Eagle] at para 40), Haida argues in its written submissions tha......
-
Centric Brands Holding LLC v. Stikeman Elliott LLP, 2024 FC 204
...standard applies no deference to the underlying decision-maker (Clorox at para 23; Tokai of Canada Ltd v Kingsford Products Company, LLC, 2021 FC 782 [Tokai] at para [24] However, where an applicant leads new evidence in an appeal of a decision of the Registrar, this can result in a differe......
-
2023 BCSC 797,
...expert evidence, survey evidence must be prepared by a properly qualified expert: Tokai of Canada Ltd. v. Kingsford Product Company, LLC, 2021 FC 782 at para. 17 Evidence tendered on an application for certification must meet the usual criteria for admissibility: Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v.......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Tweak-D Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 238
...actual use: McDowell v. Laverana GmbH & Co. KG, 2017 FC 327 at paras. 42-46; Tokai of Canada Ltd. v. Kingsford Products Company, LLC, 2021 FC 782 at para. 56; Puma at para. 48. Here, there were only four relevant registrations—TRIBAL, TRIBAL INDULGENCES, URBAN: TRIBE, and TRIBE&#......
-
Haida Tourism Partnership D.B.A. West Coast Resorts v. The Ship-source Oil Pollution Fund, 2024 FC 439
...standard applies no deference to the underlying decision-maker (Clorox at para 23; Tokai of Canada Ltd v Kingsford Products Company, LLC, 2021 FC 782 at para [33] Relying on Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd v Canada, 2016 FCA 130 [Agnico-Eagle] at para 40), Haida argues in its written submissions tha......
-
Centric Brands Holding LLC v. Stikeman Elliott LLP, 2024 FC 204
...standard applies no deference to the underlying decision-maker (Clorox at para 23; Tokai of Canada Ltd v Kingsford Products Company, LLC, 2021 FC 782 [Tokai] at para [24] However, where an applicant leads new evidence in an appeal of a decision of the Registrar, this can result in a differe......
-
2023 BCSC 797,
...expert evidence, survey evidence must be prepared by a properly qualified expert: Tokai of Canada Ltd. v. Kingsford Product Company, LLC, 2021 FC 782 at para. 17 Evidence tendered on an application for certification must meet the usual criteria for admissibility: Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v.......
Request a trial to view additional results