TOMCALA v. INPUT CAPITAL CORP., 2022 SKQB 89

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeTOCHOR
Citation2022 SKQB 89
Date30 March 2022
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket NumberQBG 1793 of 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Loraas v Loraas Disposal North Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 28 de novembro de 2023
    ...is a general presumption that those documents must be disclosed in their entirety”. He referenced PCL, Tomcala v Input Capital Corp., 2022 SKQB 89, and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Saskatchewan, 2022 SKQB 28, 467 DLR (4th) 163, for the general proposition that when a document is liste......
  • Bell v Insulation Applicators Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 24 de novembro de 2023
    ...L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 31 [ S.B.R.]; May v Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 2021 SKQB 299 at para 19; Tomcala v Input Capital Corp., 2022 SKQB 89 at para 9 [ 42 If a document has not been disclosed or produced, the party seeking to have it disclosed or produced bears the onus of persu......
2 cases
  • Loraas v Loraas Disposal North Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 28 de novembro de 2023
    ...is a general presumption that those documents must be disclosed in their entirety”. He referenced PCL, Tomcala v Input Capital Corp., 2022 SKQB 89, and Canadian Pacific Railway Company v Saskatchewan, 2022 SKQB 28, 467 DLR (4th) 163, for the general proposition that when a document is liste......
  • Bell v Insulation Applicators Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 24 de novembro de 2023
    ...L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 31 [ S.B.R.]; May v Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 2021 SKQB 299 at para 19; Tomcala v Input Capital Corp., 2022 SKQB 89 at para 9 [ 42 If a document has not been disclosed or produced, the party seeking to have it disclosed or produced bears the onus of persu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT