Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasir, 2018 BCSC 1909

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeAffleck
Citation2018 BCSC 1909
Docket NumberS183541
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date15 August 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2020 BCSC 2304
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 21, 2020
    ...C.C.C. (3d) 481 (B.C.C.A.). [13]        The final decision is Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2018 BCSC 1909. In that case, Justice Affleck was faced with a similar argument, namely that the Court lacked jurisdiction because of an accused person&a......
  • rans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2022 BCSC 2388
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 16, 2022
    ...and the like—have been repeatedly rejected as contrary to established jurisprudence: see Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2018 BCSC 1909 at paras. 21-25; Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2019 BCSC 2472 at paras. 47-48; Gallagher Reasons at paras. 120-......
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2022 BCSC 2386
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 7, 2022
    ...rights and the like, have been repeatedly rejected as contrary to established jurisprudence: see Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2018 BCSC 1909 at paras. 21–25; Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2019 BCSC 2472 at paras. 47–48; Gallagher Reasons at p......
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2022 BCSC 2241
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 22, 2022
    ...contempt proceedings in relation to the Injunction. [83]       In Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2018 BCSC 1909, Affleck J. addressed the same “lack of jurisdiction” argument that was advanced by the accused, S.B., another Indigenou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 21, 2020
    ...C.C.C. (3d) 481 (B.C.C.A.). [13]        The final decision is Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2018 BCSC 1909. In that case, Justice Affleck was faced with a similar argument, namely that the Court lacked jurisdiction because of an accused person&a......
  • rans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 16, 2022
    ...and the like—have been repeatedly rejected as contrary to established jurisprudence: see Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2018 BCSC 1909 at paras. 21-25; Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2019 BCSC 2472 at paras. 47-48; Gallagher Reasons at paras. 120-......
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 7, 2022
    ...rights and the like, have been repeatedly rejected as contrary to established jurisprudence: see Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2018 BCSC 1909 at paras. 21–25; Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2019 BCSC 2472 at paras. 47–48; Gallagher Reasons at p......
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 13, 2020
    ...11-12. [123] The same argument was made and rejected by this Court in this very proceeding. In Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2018 BCSC 1909 at paras. 21-24. Justice Affleck [24] Another argument that might have been made by S.B. is that the injunction is invalid so far as it purp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT