Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44
| Judge | Smith |
| Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 06, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Citations | 2019 NSSC 44 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Lin v. Song,
...an uncontested hearing? Law and Analysis [21] In Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44, Justice Ann E. Smith summarized the applicable principles when determining costs: [2] &......
-
Link v. Link,
...light of the complexity of the issues (which would ordinarily attract a tariff “A” amount): Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44; MGL Consulting and Investments Limited v Perks Coffee Limited, 2010 NSSC 426; Grue v McLellan, 2018 NSSC 151 ; Royal Bank of Canada v Color......
-
Woodill v. Tiller, 2019 NSSC 325
...of a lump sum award in his submissions. However, he references Justice Smith’s decision in Tri-Mac Holdings v Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44, in which the court notes that the starting point in awarding costs is the Tariff of Costs and Fees under Rule 77. He also references the Cou......
-
Raymond v. Halifax Regional Municipality,
...C would not provide a substantial contribution to Halifax Water’s reasonable fees and expenses. [21] In Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44 ("Tri-Mac"), the Court held that a departure from Tariff C is warranted “when the basic award of costs would not adequately serve the princip......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Lin v. Song,
...an uncontested hearing? Law and Analysis [21] In Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44, Justice Ann E. Smith summarized the applicable principles when determining costs: [2] &......
-
Link v. Link,
...light of the complexity of the issues (which would ordinarily attract a tariff “A” amount): Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44; MGL Consulting and Investments Limited v Perks Coffee Limited, 2010 NSSC 426; Grue v McLellan, 2018 NSSC 151 ; Royal Bank of Canada v Color......
-
Woodill v. Tiller, 2019 NSSC 325
...of a lump sum award in his submissions. However, he references Justice Smith’s decision in Tri-Mac Holdings v Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44, in which the court notes that the starting point in awarding costs is the Tariff of Costs and Fees under Rule 77. He also references the Cou......
-
Raymond v. Halifax Regional Municipality,
...C would not provide a substantial contribution to Halifax Water’s reasonable fees and expenses. [21] In Tri-Mac Holdings Inc. v. Ostrom, 2019 NSSC 44 ("Tri-Mac"), the Court held that a departure from Tariff C is warranted “when the basic award of costs would not adequately serve the princip......
Request a trial to view additional results