TS (Re), 2021 ABPC 65
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Judge | Honourable Judge Steven E. Lipton |
| Docket Number | CP901000029 |
| Date | 19 February 2021 |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Citation | 2021 ABPC 65 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director),
...not have competing guardianship applications. [264] My colleague, Lipton J, released his costs decision in TS(Re), 2021 ABPC 65. Upon analysis of the various costs decisions, Lipton J. held that LB remains binding authority for the principle that the Provincial Court......
-
JJ (Re),
...Court has the authority to make an award of costs has been eloquently addressed recently by my brother, Judge Lipton, in TS(re), 2021 ABPC 65 at paras 19-35. Ultimately, Judge Lipton concluded this court lacks jurisdiction to award costs in applications made under the CYFEA and ......
2 cases
-
JJ (Re),
...Court has the authority to make an award of costs has been eloquently addressed recently by my brother, Judge Lipton, in TS(re), 2021 ABPC 65 at paras 19-35. Ultimately, Judge Lipton concluded this court lacks jurisdiction to award costs in applications made under the CYFEA and ......
-
MU v Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director),
...not have competing guardianship applications. [264] My colleague, Lipton J, released his costs decision in TS(Re), 2021 ABPC 65. Upon analysis of the various costs decisions, Lipton J. held that LB remains binding authority for the principle that the Provincial Court......