TSATSI v. COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF SASKATCHEWAN, 2016 SKQB 389
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | PRITCHARD J. |
| Citation | 2016 SKQB 389 |
| Docket Number | QB 1008 of 2011 |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,TORTS,LIBEL AND SLANDER |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 25 November 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Digest: Tsatsi v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKCA 53
...against the respondents, the College of Physicians and Surgeons, the then-Minister of Health and the Sunrise Heath Region (SHR) (see: 2016 SKQB 389). During a review by the college of the appellant�s work as a radiologist while in the employ of the respondent SHR, concerns were raised regar......
-
Tsatsi v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKCA 53
...Honourable Chief Justice Richards In concurrence: The Honourable Mr. Justice Ottenbreit The Honourable Mr. Justice Herauf On Appeal From: 2016 SKQB 389, Regina Appeal Heard: June 12, 2018 Counsel: W. Timothy Stodalka for the Appellant Kevin Williams for the Respondent, College of Physicians......
1 cases
-
Tsatsi v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKCA 53
...Honourable Chief Justice Richards In concurrence: The Honourable Mr. Justice Ottenbreit The Honourable Mr. Justice Herauf On Appeal From: 2016 SKQB 389, Regina Appeal Heard: June 12, 2018 Counsel: W. Timothy Stodalka for the Appellant Kevin Williams for the Respondent, College of Physicians......
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Tsatsi v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKCA 53
...against the respondents, the College of Physicians and Surgeons, the then-Minister of Health and the Sunrise Heath Region (SHR) (see: 2016 SKQB 389). During a review by the college of the appellant�s work as a radiologist while in the employ of the respondent SHR, concerns were raised regar......