Turk v. Turk, 2017 ONSC 6889

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgeC. HORKINS J.
Citation2017 ONSC 6889
Date28 November 2017
Docket NumberFS-14-19285
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Turk v. Turk,, 2018 ONSC 3822
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 20, 2018
    ...respondent, Stuart Turk (“Stuart”). It must be read together with my Reasons for Judgment (“the Judgment”) (2017 ONSC 6889) and Reasons for Decision (2018 ONSC 1931) both of which are relied upon for the purpose of deciding [2]      ......
  • Malaviya v. Dhir,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 28, 2023
    ...at the trial. [90]       Concern and anxiousness are not sufficient bases to prove duress: Turk v. Turk, 2017 ONSC 6889 at para. 315, affirmed in Turk v. Turk, 2018 ONCA 993. Unconscionability [91]       Unconscionability involves ......
  • Turk v. Turk, 2018 ONCA 993
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 6, 2018
    ...appeal from the order of Justice Carolyn J. Horkins of the Superior Court of Justice, dated November 28, 2017, with reasons reported at 2017 ONSC 6889. REASONS FOR DECISION [1] The parties were married for nearly 19 years and had two children. Following their separation in 2008, they resolv......
  • Turk v. Turk, 2018 ONSC 1931
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 8, 2018
    ...Turk (“Jennifer”), and the respondent, Stuart Turk (“Stuart”). These reasons for decision must be read together with the Judgment (2017 ONSC 6889). I rely on the facts set out in the Judgment. [2] In the Judgment, I made various orders. Jennifer’s request to declare the April 26, 2010 Separ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Turk v. Turk,, 2018 ONSC 3822
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 20, 2018
    ...respondent, Stuart Turk (“Stuart”). It must be read together with my Reasons for Judgment (“the Judgment”) (2017 ONSC 6889) and Reasons for Decision (2018 ONSC 1931) both of which are relied upon for the purpose of deciding [2]      ......
  • Malaviya v. Dhir,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 28, 2023
    ...at the trial. [90]       Concern and anxiousness are not sufficient bases to prove duress: Turk v. Turk, 2017 ONSC 6889 at para. 315, affirmed in Turk v. Turk, 2018 ONCA 993. Unconscionability [91]       Unconscionability involves ......
  • Turk v. Turk, 2018 ONCA 993
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 6, 2018
    ...appeal from the order of Justice Carolyn J. Horkins of the Superior Court of Justice, dated November 28, 2017, with reasons reported at 2017 ONSC 6889. REASONS FOR DECISION [1] The parties were married for nearly 19 years and had two children. Following their separation in 2008, they resolv......
  • Turk v. Turk, 2018 ONSC 1931
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 8, 2018
    ...Turk (“Jennifer”), and the respondent, Stuart Turk (“Stuart”). These reasons for decision must be read together with the Judgment (2017 ONSC 6889). I rely on the facts set out in the Judgment. [2] In the Judgment, I made various orders. Jennifer’s request to declare the April 26, 2010 Separ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT