Turpin v. R, 2019 NBCA 78
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Richard; The Honourable Justice Larlee; The Honourable Justice Green; The Honourable Justice French; The Honourable Justice LaVigne |
| Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
| Case Date | October 31, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
| Citations | 2019 NBCA 78 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R v Laberge,
...for a trial judge. Commons errors in that process have been identified by authorities. [441] In R v Turpin, 2019 NBCA 78, although the appeal was allowed on other grounds, the Court set out a helpful list of errors also alleged to have been made by the trial ju......
-
New Brunswick College of Pharmacists v. Province of New Brunswick (as represented by the Minister of Health),
...the starting point must always be the text itself. As stated by Chief Justice Richard of our Court of Appeal in Turpin v. R., 2019 NBCA 78 [41] With all due respect, I align myself with the views expressed on this point in Halsbur......
-
Rex v Laberge,
...dire relative to a defence expert. Relying on R v France, 2017 ONSC 2040, [2017] OJ No 1875 (QL) (“France”) and R v Turpin, 2019 NBCA 78, 380 CCC (3d) 271, leave to appeal refused [2019] SCCA No 515 (QL) (“Turpin”), the trial judge stated it was completely improp......
-
Her Majesty the Queen v. Saumil Prashantkumar Shah,
...the balancing that is required when considering the admissibility of expert evidence in the fairly recent decision of Turpin v. R., 2019 NBCA 78 (CanLII), a decision penned by Chief Justice Richard. He [44] Mohan stands for the proposition that a party seeking to introduce......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R v Laberge,
...for a trial judge. Commons errors in that process have been identified by authorities. [441] In R v Turpin, 2019 NBCA 78, although the appeal was allowed on other grounds, the Court set out a helpful list of errors also alleged to have been made by the trial ju......
-
New Brunswick College of Pharmacists v. Province of New Brunswick (as represented by the Minister of Health),
...the starting point must always be the text itself. As stated by Chief Justice Richard of our Court of Appeal in Turpin v. R., 2019 NBCA 78 [41] With all due respect, I align myself with the views expressed on this point in Halsbur......
-
Rex v Laberge,
...dire relative to a defence expert. Relying on R v France, 2017 ONSC 2040, [2017] OJ No 1875 (QL) (“France”) and R v Turpin, 2019 NBCA 78, 380 CCC (3d) 271, leave to appeal refused [2019] SCCA No 515 (QL) (“Turpin”), the trial judge stated it was completely improp......
-
Her Majesty the Queen v. Saumil Prashantkumar Shah,
...the balancing that is required when considering the admissibility of expert evidence in the fairly recent decision of Turpin v. R., 2019 NBCA 78 (CanLII), a decision penned by Chief Justice Richard. He [44] Mohan stands for the proposition that a party seeking to introduce......
Request a trial to view additional results