Tysseland v Tysseland,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Caldwell,Kalmakoff,Richards |
| Citation | 2022 SKCA 39 |
| Date | 01 January 2022 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3682; CACV3898 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13
...Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014; Boston v. Boston, 2001 SCC 43, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 413; Tysseland v. Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39; Ackerman v. Ackerman, 2014 SKCA 137, 451 Sask. R. 132; Jedfro Investments (U.S.A.) Ltd. v. Jacyk, 2007 SCC 55, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 679; Tether v.......
-
Anderson v Anderson,
...Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014; Boston v. Boston, 2001 SCC 43, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 413; Tysseland v. Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39; Ackerman v. Ackerman, 2014 SKCA 137, 451 Sask. R. 132; Jedfro Investments (U.S.A.) Ltd. v. Jacyk, 2007 SCC 55, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 679; Tether v.......
-
6517633 Canada Ltd v Gibson Creek Farms Ltd,
...obviously unjust as to invite intervention’”. See also: McNabb v Cyr, 2018 SKCA 51 at para 31; and Tysseland v Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39 at para 44 Although I recognize the deference that is normally shown to an award of costs, the exceptional nature of an order of solicitor and......
-
Wilk v Martin-Wilk,
...to have that award set aside. 86 An order for costs is discretionary in nature and entitled to deference on appeal: Tysseland v Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39 at para 14. Ms. Martin-Wilk was generally successful on both applications in the Court of King's Bench, although her claim for retroac......
4 cases
-
Anderson v. Anderson, 2023 SCC 13
...Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014; Boston v. Boston, 2001 SCC 43, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 413; Tysseland v. Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39; Ackerman v. Ackerman, 2014 SKCA 137, 451 Sask. R. 132; Jedfro Investments (U.S.A.) Ltd. v. Jacyk, 2007 SCC 55, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 679; Tether v.......
-
Anderson v Anderson,
...Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014; Boston v. Boston, 2001 SCC 43, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 413; Tysseland v. Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39; Ackerman v. Ackerman, 2014 SKCA 137, 451 Sask. R. 132; Jedfro Investments (U.S.A.) Ltd. v. Jacyk, 2007 SCC 55, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 679; Tether v.......
-
6517633 Canada Ltd v Gibson Creek Farms Ltd,
...obviously unjust as to invite intervention’”. See also: McNabb v Cyr, 2018 SKCA 51 at para 31; and Tysseland v Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39 at para 44 Although I recognize the deference that is normally shown to an award of costs, the exceptional nature of an order of solicitor and......
-
Wilk v Martin-Wilk,
...to have that award set aside. 86 An order for costs is discretionary in nature and entitled to deference on appeal: Tysseland v Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39 at para 14. Ms. Martin-Wilk was generally successful on both applications in the Court of King's Bench, although her claim for retroac......