Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABQB 208 |
| Citation | 2021 ABQB 208 |
| Date | 18 March 2021 |
| Docket Number | 1801 17978 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 practice notes
-
Rana v Rana
...ABQB 45; Onischuk (Re), 2019 ABQB 229; Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2019 ABQB 396; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208; Knutson (Re), 2021 ABQB 367; McMunn v Hok, 2021 ABQB 550; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden, 2021 ABQB 985, leave to appeal to SC......
-
Rana v Rana
...ABQB 45; Onischuk (Re), 2019 ABQB 229; Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2019 ABQB 396; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208; Knutson (Re), 2021 ABQB 367; McMunn v Hok, 2021 ABQB 550; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden, 2021 ABQB 985, leave to appeal to SC......
-
Rana v Rana
...ABQB 45; Onischuk (Re), 2019 ABQB 229; Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2019 ABQB 396; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208; Knutson (Re), 2021 ABQB 367; McMunn v Hok, 2021 ABQB 550; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden, 2021 ABQB 985, leave to appeal to SC......
-
Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson
...ABQB 45; Onischuk (Re), 2019 ABQB 229; Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2019 ABQB 396; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208; Knutson (Re), 2021 ABQB 367; McMunn v Hok, 2021 ABQB 550; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden, 2021 ABQB 985, leave to appeal to SC......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
Rana v Rana
...ABQB 45; Onischuk (Re), 2019 ABQB 229; Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2019 ABQB 396; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208; Knutson (Re), 2021 ABQB 367; McMunn v Hok, 2021 ABQB 550; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden, 2021 ABQB 985, leave to appeal to SC......
-
Rana v Rana
...ABQB 45; Onischuk (Re), 2019 ABQB 229; Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2019 ABQB 396; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208; Knutson (Re), 2021 ABQB 367; McMunn v Hok, 2021 ABQB 550; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden, 2021 ABQB 985, leave to appeal to SC......
-
Rana v Rana
...ABQB 45; Onischuk (Re), 2019 ABQB 229; Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2019 ABQB 396; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208; Knutson (Re), 2021 ABQB 367; McMunn v Hok, 2021 ABQB 550; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden, 2021 ABQB 985, leave to appeal to SC......
-
Liu v Kadiri
...ABQB 45; Onischuk (Re), 2019 ABQB 229; Fletcher v Davidson & Williams LLP, 2019 ABQB 396; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2021 ABQB 208; Knutson (Re), 2021 ABQB 367; McMunn v Hok, 2021 ABQB 550; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Hayden, 2021 ABQB 985, leave to appeal to SC......
Get Started for Free