United Nurses of Alberta v Alberta Health Services,
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Barbara Lea Veldhuis,The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz |
Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 194 |
Citation | 2021 ABCA 194 |
Date | 25 May 2021 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Docket Number | 1901-0146-AC |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) v. Gibraltar Mines Ltd.,
...the more general Moore test for discrimination in human rights legislation: see e.g., United Nurses of Alberta v Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 at para. 77; Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110 at paras. 80–81. A recognition that Campbell River does ......
-
British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) v Gibraltar Mines Ltd,
...the more general Moore test for discrimination in human rights legislation: see e.g., United Nurses of Alberta v Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 at para. 77; Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110 at paras. 80–81. A recognition that Campbell River does not requir......
-
Alberta Court Of Appeal Confirms Test For Family Status Discrimination
...decision of United Nurses of Alberta v. Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 ("UNA"), affirmed that the Moore test for prima facie discrimination, as set down by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 ("Moore"), is the appropriate test for determ......
-
Clarity From Confusion: Court Confirms Test For Family Status Discrimination
...- at least in Alberta - with the release of the Court of Appeal's decision in United Nurses of Alberta v Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 ("Daigle"). In Daigle, the Court stated with some force that the proper test for establishing a case of prima facie family-status discrimination in......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) v. Gibraltar Mines Ltd.,
...the more general Moore test for discrimination in human rights legislation: see e.g., United Nurses of Alberta v Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 at para. 77; Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110 at paras. 80–81. A recognition that Campbell River does ......
-
British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal) v Gibraltar Mines Ltd,
...the more general Moore test for discrimination in human rights legislation: see e.g., United Nurses of Alberta v Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 at para. 77; Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110 at paras. 80–81. A recognition that Campbell River does not requir......
6 firm's commentaries
-
Alberta Court Of Appeal Confirms Test For Family Status Discrimination
...decision of United Nurses of Alberta v. Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 ("UNA"), affirmed that the Moore test for prima facie discrimination, as set down by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 ("Moore"), is the appropriate test for determ......
-
Clarity From Confusion: Court Confirms Test For Family Status Discrimination
...- at least in Alberta - with the release of the Court of Appeal's decision in United Nurses of Alberta v Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 ("Daigle"). In Daigle, the Court stated with some force that the proper test for establishing a case of prima facie family-status discrimination in......
-
Alberta Court Of Appeal Confirms Complainants Need Not Prove Reasonable Efforts To Self-accommodate To Establish Family Status Discrimination
...to accommodate family status is not consistent in all Canadian jurisdictions. In United Nurses of Alberta v. Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 (United Nurses ABCA), the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) recently left no doubt that, as indicated in 2015 by the Alberta Court of Queen's Benc......
-
Modern Family (Status): Court Of Appeal Clarifies Test For Family Status Discrimination In B.C.
...dismissed as "misconceived". The Court was addressing concerns raised in cases like United Nurses of Alberta v. Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 194 and Canada (AG) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA (c) Most significantly, the Court confirmed the standard of "materiality" is consistent with human ri......
Request a trial to view additional results