United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Associate Chief Justice H. Holmes
Citation2020 BCSC 1607
Date28 October 2020
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket Number27761
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Korea v. Jung,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 15 mars 2023
    ...the allegations were “significant enough to justify the remedy sought”: at para. 52, citing United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607. [122]    The materials before the committal judge included the original ROC, as well as three supplementary ROCs: at para. ......
  • Korea v. Jung, 2020 BCSC 1978
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 décembre 2020
    ...branch of the test, Mr. Jung must demonstrate that the allegations are significant enough to justify the remedy sought: U.S.A. v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607. In other words, Mr. Jung’s submissions, when considered at their best, must show a reasonable prospect of satisfying the test for staying p......
  • Korea v Jung,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 15 mars 2023
    ...that the allegations were “significant enough to justify the remedy sought”: at para. 52, citing United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607. 122 The materials before the committal judge included the original ROC, as well as three supplementary ROCs: at para. 14. Cumulatively, these......
  • U.S.A. v. Lim, 2021 BCSC 329
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 26 février 2021
    ...also seeks disclosure of American gathered evidence.  He submits that the applicable law was recently set out in U.S.A. v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607 at paras. 39 to 50.  There, the court allowed an application to admit evidence, an omission, that was “realistically capable ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Korea v. Jung,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 15 mars 2023
    ...the allegations were “significant enough to justify the remedy sought”: at para. 52, citing United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607. [122]    The materials before the committal judge included the original ROC, as well as three supplementary ROCs: at para. ......
  • Korea v. Jung, 2020 BCSC 1978
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 décembre 2020
    ...branch of the test, Mr. Jung must demonstrate that the allegations are significant enough to justify the remedy sought: U.S.A. v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607. In other words, Mr. Jung’s submissions, when considered at their best, must show a reasonable prospect of satisfying the test for staying p......
  • Korea v Jung,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 15 mars 2023
    ...that the allegations were “significant enough to justify the remedy sought”: at para. 52, citing United States v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607. 122 The materials before the committal judge included the original ROC, as well as three supplementary ROCs: at para. 14. Cumulatively, these......
  • U.S.A. v. Lim, 2021 BCSC 329
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 26 février 2021
    ...also seeks disclosure of American gathered evidence.  He submits that the applicable law was recently set out in U.S.A. v. Meng, 2020 BCSC 1607 at paras. 39 to 50.  There, the court allowed an application to admit evidence, an omission, that was “realistically capable ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT