Unrau v National Dental Examining Board,

JudgeJ.D. Rooke
Citation2018 ABQB 874
Docket Number1801 12350
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date24 October 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
183 practice notes
  • IntelliView Technologies Inc v Badawy, 2018 ABQB 961
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Novembre 2018
    ...function has emerged is irrelevant to solving that problem. [Emphasis in original.] See also Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874 at para E. Conflicts of Interests [79] Mr. Badawy makes numerous allegations that there are many conflicts of interest in this matter. He compl......
  • Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 22 Gennaio 2019
    ...Court to better manage abusive litigation in a timely, proportionate, and cost-effective manner: Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874. The Procedure permits a document-only “show cause” mechanism where a court filing may be reviewed per Rule 3.68 to evaluate whether that f......
  • Heiser v Bowden Institution, 2021 ABQB 1007
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16 Dicembre 2021
    ...is intended to provide a timely, proportionate, and cost-effective response to the litigants: Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874 [Unrau #1]. [7]           If, on initial review by the Court, the pleading appears to be unm......
  • Harun-ar-Rashid v Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), 2019 ABQB 54
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 23 Gennaio 2019
    ...(21 September 2017). [27] A court may strike out pleadings where parties cannot be identified: Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874 at paras [28] Deficient pleadings are also a basis on which a court may conclude that a lawsuit is a vexatious proceeding. Allegations that h......
  • Get Started for Free
181 cases
  • IntelliView Technologies Inc v Badawy, 2018 ABQB 961
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 30 Novembre 2018
    ...function has emerged is irrelevant to solving that problem. [Emphasis in original.] See also Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874 at para E. Conflicts of Interests [79] Mr. Badawy makes numerous allegations that there are many conflicts of interest in this matter. He compl......
  • Labonte v Alberta Health Services, 2019 ABQB 41
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 22 Gennaio 2019
    ...Court to better manage abusive litigation in a timely, proportionate, and cost-effective manner: Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874. The Procedure permits a document-only “show cause” mechanism where a court filing may be reviewed per Rule 3.68 to evaluate whether that f......
  • Heiser v Bowden Institution, 2021 ABQB 1007
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 16 Dicembre 2021
    ...is intended to provide a timely, proportionate, and cost-effective response to the litigants: Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874 [Unrau #1]. [7]           If, on initial review by the Court, the pleading appears to be unm......
  • Harun-ar-Rashid v Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), 2019 ABQB 54
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 23 Gennaio 2019
    ...(21 September 2017). [27] A court may strike out pleadings where parties cannot be identified: Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874 at paras [28] Deficient pleadings are also a basis on which a court may conclude that a lawsuit is a vexatious proceeding. Allegations that h......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • WORN OUT FACES: REPEAT SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS AT THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 55 No. 1, January 2022
    • 1 Gennaio 2022
    ...Bench of Alberta Civil Practice Note No. 7" (4 September 2018), online (pdf): Alberta Courts ; Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874. (129) See Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2019 ABQB 283 at paras 626-30 [Unrau, (130) See Meads, supra note 53 at para 264 (where t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT