United States of America v. Drysdale et al., [2000] O.T.C. 72 (SC)
Judge | Dambrot, J. |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Case Date | January 31, 2000 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | [2000] O.T.C. 72 (SC) |
USA v. Drysdale, [2000] O.T.C. 72 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2000] O.T.C. TBEd. FE.097
The United States of America (requesting state/respondent) v. Karl Drysdale, Bruce Hahn, Cecil Patrick Manningham, Bruce DeBarros and Radomir Pajkovic (persons sought/applicants)
(E-9/99)
Indexed As: United States of America v. Drysdale et al.
Court of Ontario
Superior Court of Justice
Dambrot, J.
January 31, 2000.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Civil Rights - Topic 3129
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings - Extradition proceedings - See paragraph 29.
Extradition - Topic 18
General - Bars to extradition - General - See paragraphs 7 to 19.
Extradition - Topic 1403
Jurisdiction - Courts - Charter issues - See paragraphs 20 to 27.
Extradition - Topic 2607
Evidence and procedure before examining judge - General - Role of extradition judge - See paragraphs 66 to 91.
Extradition - Topic 2643.2
Evidence and procedure before examining judge - Evidence - General - Cross-examination - See paragraphs 41 to 48.
Extradition - Topic 2660
Evidence and procedure before examining judge - Evidence - General - The record (incl. certification) - See paragraphs 29 to 40.
Extradition - Topic 2702
Evidence and procedure before examining judge - Procedure - Authority to proceed - See paragraphs 49 to 65 and 82 to 91.
Extradition - Topic 2914
Provisional arrest and detention - Warrant of committal - General - Authority to proceed - See paragraphs 49 to 65 and 82 to 91.
Extradition - Topic 2921
Provisional arrest and detention - Warrant of committal - Grounds for issue of - General - See paragraphs 92 to 137.
Cases Noticed:
United States of America v. Cobb et al. (1999), 125 O.A.C. 122 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22].
United States of America et al. v. Dynar, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 462; 213 N.R. 321; 101 O.A.C. 321; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 481, refd to. [para. 35].
R. v. Nixon et al. (1984), 10 C.C.C.(3d) 376 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 36].
Philippines (Republic) v. Pacificador (1993), 64 O.A.C. 344; 83 C.C.C.(3d) 210 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36].
United States of America v. Smith (1984), 2 O.A.C. 1; 10 C.C.C.(3d) 540 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].
Schmidt v. Canada et al. (1984), 2 O.A.C. 336; 10 C.C.C.(3d) 564 (C.A.), affd. [1987] 1 S.C.R. 500; 76 N.R. 12; 20 O.A.C. 161; 33 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 42].
United States of America v. Manno (1996), 112 C.C.C.(3d) 544 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 68].
United States of America v. Tavormina (1996), 112 C.C.C.(3d) 563 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 68].
Denmark v. Nielson (1984), 79 Cr. App. Rep. 15 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 75].
United States of America v. McVey, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 475; 144 N.R. 81; 16 B.C.A.C. 241; 28 W.A.C. 241; 77 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 79].
United States of America v. Lépine, [1994] 1 S.C.R. 286; 163 N.R. 1; 69 O.A.C. 241; 87 C.C.C.(3d) 385, refd to. [para. 88].
R. v. Rojas (J.) (1997), 41 O.T.C. 208 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 108].
R. v. Longworth et al. (1982), 67 C.C.C.(2d) 554 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 115].
R. v. Vrany et al. (1979), 46 C.C.C.(2d) 14 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 117].
R. v. Sokoloski (1977), 13 N.R. 191; 33 C.C.C.(2d) 496 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 118].
R. v. Sheppe, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 22; 31 N.R. 437, refd to. [para. 118].
Statutes Noticed:
Extradition Act, S.C. 1999, c. 18, sect. 25 [para. 21].
Counsel:
Carole Sheppard, for the requesting state;
Marshall Sack, for Drysdale;
John Norris, for Hahn;
Paul Slansky, for Manningham;
J.S. Rotenberg, for DeBarros;
Wes Wilson, for Pajkovic.
This action was heard by Dambrot, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following decision on January 31, 2000.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial