V.H. v. B.C. (A.G.), 2005 BCSC 139

JudgeDavies, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 04, 2005
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2005 BCSC 139;[2005] B.C.T.C. 139 (SC)

V.H. v. B.C. (A.G.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 139 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. FE.076

V.H. and L.H. (plaintiffs) v. Attorney General of British Columbia, Crown Counsel of British Columbia, The Central Authority of British Columbia, The Ministry of Children and Family Development, The Legal Services Society of British Columbia, Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, West Vancouver Police Department, The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Stanley Schwartz, Jeremy Sheppard, Ian Hayward, Dr. Paul Eirikson, Michelle Fuchs, C.R., S.H., M.H., P.O., J.O., H.B., A.J., P.L. and A.T. (defendants)

(S041197; 2005 BCSC 139)

Indexed As: V.H. and L.H. v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Davies, J.

February 4, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Evidence - Topic 7002.1

Opinion evidence - Expert evidence - General - Expert witness immunity - See paragraphs 116 to 123.

Government Programs - Topic 1451

Legal aid - Entitlement - Family law matters - See paragraphs 141 to 147.

Practice - Topic 2228

Pleadings - Striking out pleadings - Grounds - Res judicata - See paragraphs 71 to 73.

Practice - Topic 2231

Pleadings - Striking out pleadings - Grounds - False - Frivolous, vexatious or scandalous - See paragraphs 71 to 73.

Practice - Topic 2238

Pleadings - Striking out pleadings - Grounds - Prejudice - Embarrass or delay fair trial - See paragraphs 70 to 73.

Practice - Topic 2239

Pleadings - Striking out pleadings - Grounds - Abuse of process or delay - See paragraphs 71 to 73.

Practice - Topic 5408.1

Judgments and orders - General - Collateral attack - See paragraphs 71 to 73.

Torts - Topic 6151

Abuse of legal procedure - Malicious prosecution - General - See paragraphs 92 to 101.

Cases Noticed:

Wayneroy Holdings Ltd. v. Sideen et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 1510; 2002 BCSC 1510, refd to. [para. 56].

Citizens for Foreign Aid Reform Inc. v. Canadian Jewish Congress et al. (1999), 23 B.C.T.C. 98 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 58].

Angle v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 248; 2 N.R. 397; 47 D.L.R.(3d) 544, refd to. [para. 61].

McIntosh v. Parent, [1924] 4 D.L.R. 420; 55 O.L.R. 552 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 62].

R. v. Wilson, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 594; 51 N.R. 321; 26 Man.R.(2d) 194; 9 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 4 D.L.R.(4th) 577, refd to. [para. 63].

Gittings v. Caneco Audio Publishers Inc. (1987), 17 B.C.L.R.(2d) 38 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 70].

Nelles v. Ontario et al., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 170; 98 N.R. 321; 35 O.A.C. 161; 60 D.L.R.(4th) 609; 49 C.C.L.T. 217, refd to. [para. 95].

Lawrence et al. v. Baynham, [2003] B.C.T.C. 211; 2003 BCSC 211, refd to. [para. 109].

Lawrence v. Sandilands - see Lawrence et al. v. Baynham.

Jensen v. MacGregor (1992), 65 B.C.L.R.(2d) 224 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 111].

Fabian v. Margulies, [1984] O.J. No. 1023 (H.C.), consd. [para. 119].

Kravit v. Dilli, [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. 827; 56 B.C.L.R.(3d) 150 (S.C.), consd. [para. 120].

Monje-Alvarez et al. v. Monje-Alvarez et al. (1992), 14 B.C.A.C. 269; 26 W.A.C. 269; 69 B.C.L.R.(2d) 99 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 125].

Hanson v. Smith and Canada (1990), 38 F.T.R. 34 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 127].

Doern v. Phillips Estate et al. (1994), 2 B.C.L.R.(3d) 349 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 140].

Grassi v. WIC Radio Ltd. et al., [2000] B.C.T.C. 97; 2000 BCSC 185, refd to. [para. 140].

Dixon v. Deacon Morgan McEwen Easson (1989), 38 B.C.L.R.(2d) 318 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 140].

Goodhead v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1997] B.C.J. No. 1779 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 140].

Ainscough v. Legal Services Society (B.C.), [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. E43 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 146].

Counsel:

V.H., plaintiff, appeared on his own behalf;

L.H., plaintiff, appeared on her own behalf;

L.D. Johnston, for the defendants, Attorney General of British Columbia, Central Authority of British Columbia, Ministry of Children and Family Development and Michelle Fuchs, for the defendant, Crown Counsel of British Columbia;

D. MacAdams, Q.C., for the defendant, the Legal Services Society of British Columbia;

C.L. Forth, for the defendants, Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, Stanley Schwartz, Jeremy Sheppard, Ian Hayward, C.R. and P.L.;

L. Sears, for the defendant, West Vancouver Police Department;

N.L. Trevethan, for the defendant, Dr. Paul Eirikson;

S.H., M.H., P.O., J.O., H.B., A.J. and A.T., defendants, appeared on their own behalf;

No appearance for the defendant, Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

This application was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on November 16, 17, 22-24, 2004, before Davies, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following judgment on February 4, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 practice notes
  • Semeniuk v. Financial Institutions Commission et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. E67
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 27 d4 Novembro d4 2008
    ...attack and/or an abuse of process, or fails to disclose a cause of action known to law. ( Haeck v. British Columbia (Attorney General) , 2005 BCSC 139; Young v. Borzoni 2007 BCCA 16, 64 B.C.L.R. (4th) 157 (C.A.); Budgell v. Oppal , 2007 BCSC 991, aff'd. 2008 BCCA 349). [21] The theme that r......
  • Acumar Consulting Engineers Ltd. et al. v. Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists (B.C.) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 814
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 9 d5 Maio d5 2014
    ...APEGBC fraud and did not." The RCMP is not a legal entity and cannot be sued, as such: V.H. v. British Columbia (Attorney General) , 2005 BCSC 139 at para. 140; Dixon v. Deacon Morgan McEwan Easson , [1989] B.C.J. No. 1471 (S.C.). Mr. Randhawa's correspondence indicates that he also complai......
  • A.T. v. L.T.H., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 331
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 8 d2 Maio d2 2007
    ...of Madam Justice Morrison reported in A.T. v. L.T.T ., 2002 BCSC 981, my judgment in V.H. v. British Columbia (Attorney General) , 2005 BCSC 139 and my judgment out of which this review application arises (reported in these proceedings at 2005 BCSC 515). [5] In my reasons for judgment dated......
  • Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1018
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 6 d5 Junho d5 2014
    ...officers is thus statutory and not vicarious, as asserted by the plaintiff. [19] In V.H. v. Attorney General of British Columbia et al., 2005 BCSC 139 at para. 140, [2005] B.C.J. No. 198, Mr. Justice Davies held, in part, that "police forces are not legal entities that can sue or be sued", ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Acumar Consulting Engineers Ltd. et al. v. Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists (B.C.) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 814
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 9 d5 Maio d5 2014
    ...APEGBC fraud and did not." The RCMP is not a legal entity and cannot be sued, as such: V.H. v. British Columbia (Attorney General) , 2005 BCSC 139 at para. 140; Dixon v. Deacon Morgan McEwan Easson , [1989] B.C.J. No. 1471 (S.C.). Mr. Randhawa's correspondence indicates that he also complai......
  • Semeniuk v. Financial Institutions Commission et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. E67
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 27 d4 Novembro d4 2008
    ...attack and/or an abuse of process, or fails to disclose a cause of action known to law. ( Haeck v. British Columbia (Attorney General) , 2005 BCSC 139; Young v. Borzoni 2007 BCCA 16, 64 B.C.L.R. (4th) 157 (C.A.); Budgell v. Oppal , 2007 BCSC 991, aff'd. 2008 BCCA 349). [21] The theme that r......
  • A.T. v. L.T.H., [2007] B.C.T.C. Uned. 331
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 8 d2 Maio d2 2007
    ...of Madam Justice Morrison reported in A.T. v. L.T.T ., 2002 BCSC 981, my judgment in V.H. v. British Columbia (Attorney General) , 2005 BCSC 139 and my judgment out of which this review application arises (reported in these proceedings at 2005 BCSC 515). [5] In my reasons for judgment dated......
  • Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1018
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 6 d5 Junho d5 2014
    ...officers is thus statutory and not vicarious, as asserted by the plaintiff. [19] In V.H. v. Attorney General of British Columbia et al., 2005 BCSC 139 at para. 140, [2005] B.C.J. No. 198, Mr. Justice Davies held, in part, that "police forces are not legal entities that can sue or be sued", ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT