Valerio v. Da Silveira, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1055

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeFitzpatrick, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGE AWARDS,DAMAGES,CONTRACTS,RESTITUTION,FAMILY LAW
Citation[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1055,2011 BCSC 1055,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1055 (SC)
Date03 August 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R.R.S. v. M.D.F.T., 2020 BCSC 1235
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 Agosto 2020
    ...damages. [219]     M.D.F.T. cited Provencher v. St. Paul’s Hospital, 2015 BCSC 916, Valerio v. Da Silveira, 2011 BCSC 1055, Kearns v. Marples, 2009 BCSC 802, Yocom v. Malcolm, 1998 CanLII 5085 (BCSC), and Saviskoff v. Morton, 1997 CanLII 932 (BCSC), in support of ......
  • Pacheco v. Degife et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1570
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Agosto 2014
    ...section has been interpreted to apply not only to negligence actions but also to intentional torts like battery ( Valerio v. Silveira, 2011 BCSC 1055 at para. 207). Thus, where a plaintiff provokes an assault or battery by reasons of his or her own conduct, the plaintiff may be found at fau......
  • Chen v. Ho, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 533 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 28 Marzo 2013
    ...a party is too small to be considered an enrichment. See Rubin v. Gendemann , 2011 ABQB 71, aff'd 2012 ABCA 38; and Valerio v. Silveira , 2011 BCSC 1055. [400] The steps that Ms. Chen took on behalf of H & Y were too minor to be considered an unjust enrichment. I accept that Ms. Chen si......
3 cases
  • R.R.S. v. M.D.F.T., 2020 BCSC 1235
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 Agosto 2020
    ...damages. [219]     M.D.F.T. cited Provencher v. St. Paul’s Hospital, 2015 BCSC 916, Valerio v. Da Silveira, 2011 BCSC 1055, Kearns v. Marples, 2009 BCSC 802, Yocom v. Malcolm, 1998 CanLII 5085 (BCSC), and Saviskoff v. Morton, 1997 CanLII 932 (BCSC), in support of ......
  • Pacheco v. Degife et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1570
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 19 Agosto 2014
    ...section has been interpreted to apply not only to negligence actions but also to intentional torts like battery ( Valerio v. Silveira, 2011 BCSC 1055 at para. 207). Thus, where a plaintiff provokes an assault or battery by reasons of his or her own conduct, the plaintiff may be found at fau......
  • Chen v. Ho, [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 533 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 28 Marzo 2013
    ...a party is too small to be considered an enrichment. See Rubin v. Gendemann , 2011 ABQB 71, aff'd 2012 ABCA 38; and Valerio v. Silveira , 2011 BCSC 1055. [400] The steps that Ms. Chen took on behalf of H & Y were too minor to be considered an unjust enrichment. I accept that Ms. Chen si......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT