Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Ottenbreit, Ryan-Froslie and Tholl JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 18 |
| Date | 28 February 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3115 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Silzer v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
...of law, the correctness standard of appellate review is applicable (at para 37): see also Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18 [Van de Sype]. III. Issues [26] In relation to the Causation Decision, Ms. Silzer argues the Commission misapprehended or misinterpreted th......
-
Saskatchewan Government Insurance v Huber,
...[Mercier]; Montgrand v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2017 SKCA 2, 406 DLR (4th) 546; Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18 at para 68; Silzer v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2021 SKCA 59 at para 25 [Silzer]). [20] &#......
-
Cass v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
...ground of appeal raises a question of law. [68] Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18 [Van de Sype], is particularly apt to the jurisdictional question because, like the present matter, it, too, involved the bottom-line quest......
-
Piche v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 53
...of evidence by the Commission has been explained in a number of cases. The most recent is Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18 [Van de Sype]: [110] … These provisions make clear that the Commission may accept any evidence it considers relevant and......
4 cases
-
Silzer v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
...of law, the correctness standard of appellate review is applicable (at para 37): see also Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18 [Van de Sype]. III. Issues [26] In relation to the Causation Decision, Ms. Silzer argues the Commission misapprehended or misinterpreted th......
-
Saskatchewan Government Insurance v Huber,
...[Mercier]; Montgrand v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2017 SKCA 2, 406 DLR (4th) 546; Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18 at para 68; Silzer v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2021 SKCA 59 at para 25 [Silzer]). [20] &#......
-
Cass v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
...ground of appeal raises a question of law. [68] Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18 [Van de Sype], is particularly apt to the jurisdictional question because, like the present matter, it, too, involved the bottom-line quest......
-
Piche v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 53
...of evidence by the Commission has been explained in a number of cases. The most recent is Van de Sype v Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2020 SKCA 18 [Van de Sype]: [110] … These provisions make clear that the Commission may accept any evidence it considers relevant and......