Vancouver (City) v. Zhang et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 84 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeStromberg-Stein, J.
Citation[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 84 (SC),2009 BCSC 614,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 84,2009 BCSC 84
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,INJUNCTIONS,CIVIL RIGHTS
Date29 January 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Vancouver (City) v. Zhang et al., 2011 BCCA 138
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 19, 2010
    ...the basis of their appeal - the constitutional challenge and an allegation the enforcement of the bylaw was for an improper purpose: 2009 BCSC 614. Two provisions of the injunction were found to be spent and the appeal from them moot; the third enjoining the appellants from erecting any new......
  • Vancouver (City) v. Zhang et al., (2010) 292 B.C.A.C. 244 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 19, 2010
    ...the application and enforcement of the Bylaw. A chambers judge granted the injunction with costs to the City ( [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 84 ; 2009 BCSC 84 ("Reasons") and 2009 BCSC 614 ("Reasons for Costs")), finding no exceptional circumstances to prevent enforcement of s. 71, the Bylaw was ......
  • Batty et al. v. Toronto (City) et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 21, 2011
    ...any contravening "thing". That is what the Trespass Notice purports to do. 19. GVTA, supra., para. 53. 20. Vancouver (City) v. Zhang , 2009 BCSC 84, para. 4. 21. GVTA, supra ., para. 54. 22. Vancouver (City) v. Zhang , 2010 BCCA 450, para. 56. 23. RJR-MacDonald, supra , para. 160, citations......
  • Zhang et al. v. Vancouver (City) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2288
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 4, 2014
    ...to remove the structures. [7] This Court granted the injunction. The reasons for that decision are reported as Vancouver (City) v. Zhang , 2009 BCSC 84 [ Zhang #1 ]. [8] The petitioner's appeal to the Court of Appeal was allowed on the basis that the Original By-law was unconstitutional. Th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Vancouver (City) v. Zhang et al., 2011 BCCA 138
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 19, 2010
    ...the basis of their appeal - the constitutional challenge and an allegation the enforcement of the bylaw was for an improper purpose: 2009 BCSC 614. Two provisions of the injunction were found to be spent and the appeal from them moot; the third enjoining the appellants from erecting any new......
  • Vancouver (City) v. Zhang et al., (2010) 292 B.C.A.C. 244 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 19, 2010
    ...the application and enforcement of the Bylaw. A chambers judge granted the injunction with costs to the City ( [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 84 ; 2009 BCSC 84 ("Reasons") and 2009 BCSC 614 ("Reasons for Costs")), finding no exceptional circumstances to prevent enforcement of s. 71, the Bylaw was ......
  • Batty et al. v. Toronto (City) et al.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 21, 2011
    ...any contravening "thing". That is what the Trespass Notice purports to do. 19. GVTA, supra., para. 53. 20. Vancouver (City) v. Zhang , 2009 BCSC 84, para. 4. 21. GVTA, supra ., para. 54. 22. Vancouver (City) v. Zhang , 2010 BCCA 450, para. 56. 23. RJR-MacDonald, supra , para. 160, citations......
  • Zhang et al. v. Vancouver (City) et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2288
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 4, 2014
    ...to remove the structures. [7] This Court granted the injunction. The reasons for that decision are reported as Vancouver (City) v. Zhang , 2009 BCSC 84 [ Zhang #1 ]. [8] The petitioner's appeal to the Court of Appeal was allowed on the basis that the Original By-law was unconstitutional. Th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT