Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Ottenbreit |
| Citation | 2018 SKCA 61 |
| Date | 07 August 2018 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3268 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
AB v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta,
...does not, in its effect, decide the appeal or render it moot”); Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v. K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61, ¶ 11 (chambers) (“A single judge of this Court also has the power to preserve the status quo and prevent the frustration of an appeal”); Si......
-
Digest: Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61
...as: 2018 SKCA 61 Docket Number: CACV 3268 , CA17172 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-08-18 Judges: Ottenbreit Subjects: Civil Procedure � Appeal � Application Incidental to Appeal Injunction � Interlocutory Injunction Statutes � Interpretation � Court of Appeal Act, 2000, Section 20(1) Dig......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd., 2020 SKCA 109
...the frustration of an appeal is a fact-specific undertaking: see Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61 at para 12, 28 CPC (8th) 322 [Veolia]. This Court’s decisions in Beare and Carman Loraas v Bruce Loraas (15 May 2018) Regina, CACV3244 (Sask......
-
Goodman v Saskatchewan (Community Operations), 2020 SKCA 51
...55; Sinclair v Hlady, 2013 SKCA 112 at para 14, 427 Sask R 1; and Veolia Water Technologies Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61 at para 6, 28 CPC (8th) 322). The overall purpose of Rule 15 is “to prevent such prejudice, pending the determination of the appeal, as may ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
AB v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta,
...does not, in its effect, decide the appeal or render it moot”); Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v. K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61, ¶ 11 (chambers) (“A single judge of this Court also has the power to preserve the status quo and prevent the frustration of an appeal”); Si......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd., 2020 SKCA 109
...the frustration of an appeal is a fact-specific undertaking: see Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61 at para 12, 28 CPC (8th) 322 [Veolia]. This Court’s decisions in Beare and Carman Loraas v Bruce Loraas (15 May 2018) Regina, CACV3244 (Sask......
-
Goodman v Saskatchewan (Community Operations), 2020 SKCA 51
...55; Sinclair v Hlady, 2013 SKCA 112 at para 14, 427 Sask R 1; and Veolia Water Technologies Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61 at para 6, 28 CPC (8th) 322). The overall purpose of Rule 15 is “to prevent such prejudice, pending the determination of the appeal, as may ......
-
Saskatoon Co-operative Association Limited v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1400,
...test, an applicant must demonstrate that the appeal raises a serious question to be determined. This threshold was described in Veolia [2018 SKCA 61] as “generally a low threshold” (at para 16) that must be “crossed” (at para 17) and, in Mosaic Potash E......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Veolia Water Technologies, Inc. v K+S Potash Canada General Partnership, 2018 SKCA 61
...as: 2018 SKCA 61 Docket Number: CACV 3268 , CA17172 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-08-18 Judges: Ottenbreit Subjects: Civil Procedure � Appeal � Application Incidental to Appeal Injunction � Interlocutory Injunction Statutes � Interpretation � Court of Appeal Act, 2000, Section 20(1) Dig......