Verdonk v. Superintendent of Motor Vehicles (B.C.),

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeGriffin, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation2015 BCSC 215,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 215 (SC),[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 215
Date16 February 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 practice notes
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JANUARY 18 – 22, 2021)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • 24 Enero 2021
    ...2019 ONCA 166, Hamlin v. Kavanagh, 2019 ONSC 5552, Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, Casses v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2015 BCSC 215, Platnick v. Bent, 2018 ONCA 687 CIVIL DECISIONS BMW Canada Inc. v. Autoport Limited, 2021 ONCA 42 [Feldman, van Rensburg and Thorburn JJ.A.] Co......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 18 ' 22, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 25 Enero 2021
    ...2019 ONCA 166, Hamlin v. Kavanagh, 2019 ONSC 5552, Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, Casses v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2015 BCSC 215, Platnick v. Bent, 2018 ONCA 687 CIVIL DECISIONS BMW Canada Inc. v. Autoport Limited, 2021 ONCA 42 [Feldman, van Rensburg and Thorburn JJ.A.] Co......
  • Yuen v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 13 Junio 2022
    ...In support of her argument, Ms. Yuen cites Mason and Verdonk v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 215. [59]       In Mason, at paras. 28-32, Hori J. found that the adjudicator did not adequately address, analyze or ex......
  • Wood-Tod v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 Febrero 2020
    ...credence to the officer’s report, in a manner prohibited by cases such as Verdonk v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 215, at paras. 45-46: [45] The standard of review of reasonableness requires considerable deference to a decision-maker. However, an adjudicato......
  • Get Started for Free
11 cases
  • Yuen v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 13 Junio 2022
    ...In support of her argument, Ms. Yuen cites Mason and Verdonk v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 215. [59]       In Mason, at paras. 28-32, Hori J. found that the adjudicator did not adequately address, analyze or ex......
  • Wood-Tod v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 Febrero 2020
    ...credence to the officer’s report, in a manner prohibited by cases such as Verdonk v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 BCSC 215, at paras. 45-46: [45] The standard of review of reasonableness requires considerable deference to a decision-maker. However, an adjudicato......
  • Subway Franchise Systems of Canada, Inc. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 18 Enero 2021
    ...be made to take reasonably diligent steps to validate the accuracy of the statements made: Casses v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2015 BCSC 215, at paras. 498-530 and Grant, at para. (d) The Motion Judge’s Analysis of the First Issue [60] The motion judge acknowledged that if Subway i......
  • Koutsikaloudis v Maple Leaf Academy Ltd, 2021 ABPC 136
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 29 Abril 2021
    ...our error. We are so sorry for undue stress this may have caused you.” [101]     In George v. Cowichan Tribes 2015 BCSC 215, in awarding $35,000.00 in aggravated damages for the manner of dismissal, the court rejected the Defendant’s defence that it relied ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JANUARY 18 – 22, 2021)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • 24 Enero 2021
    ...2019 ONCA 166, Hamlin v. Kavanagh, 2019 ONSC 5552, Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, Casses v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2015 BCSC 215, Platnick v. Bent, 2018 ONCA 687 CIVIL DECISIONS BMW Canada Inc. v. Autoport Limited, 2021 ONCA 42 [Feldman, van Rensburg and Thorburn JJ.A.] Co......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 18 ' 22, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 25 Enero 2021
    ...2019 ONCA 166, Hamlin v. Kavanagh, 2019 ONSC 5552, Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, Casses v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2015 BCSC 215, Platnick v. Bent, 2018 ONCA 687 CIVIL DECISIONS BMW Canada Inc. v. Autoport Limited, 2021 ONCA 42 [Feldman, van Rensburg and Thorburn JJ.A.] Co......
  • Subway's $210 Million Chicken Content Defamation Claim Against The CBC Restored By Court Of Appeal
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 26 Enero 2021
    ...made in reporting: Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, at para. 126; Casses v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2015 BCSC 215, at paras. In this regard, the Court of Appeal found that the motions judge had erred in law by applying a higher standard to his assessment ......