British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association v. Bishop, [2006] B.C.T.C. 556 (SC)

JudgeCohen, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 31, 2006
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2006] B.C.T.C. 556 (SC);2006 BCSC 556

Veterinary Medical Assoc. v. Bishop, [2006] B.C.T.C. 556 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.073

British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association (petitioner) v. Bill Bishop (doing business as The Horse's Mouth Equine Dentistry (respondent)

(L022956; 2006 BCSC 556)

Indexed As: British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association v. Bishop

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Cohen, J.

April 6, 2006.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Practice - Topic 2493

Writs of summons, endorsements, originating summons and originating notices - Originating notices - Conversion to or from formal action - See paragraphs 16 to 27.

Professional Occupations - Topic 2604

Veterinarians - General - Veterinary medicine defined - See paragraphs 55 to 100.

Professional Occupations - Topic 2762

Veterinarians - Unauthorized practice - What constitutes - See paragraphs 55 to 100.

Statutes - Topic 2601

Interpretation - Interpretation of words and phrases - Modern rule (incl. interpretation by context) - General principles - See paragraphs 28 to 55.

Words and Phrases

Dentistry - The British Columbia Supreme Court considered the meaning of "dentistry" in the Veterinarians Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 476 - See paragraphs 56 to 100.

Counsel:

T.L. Hunter, D. Spratley and A. Wade, for the petitioner;

G.F. Gregory, for the respondent.

This application was heard on June 10, 11, 16 and 30, 2004 and January 31, 2006, before Cohen, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on April 6, 2006.

Please Note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Ryan (P.), (2006) 286 Sask.R. 272 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 6, 2006
    ...(2002), 328 A.R. 59; 2002 ABQB 848, refd to. [para. 40]. British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association v. Bishop, [2006] B.C.T.C. 556; 2006 BCSC 556, refd to. [para. British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association v. MacDonald (2005), 213 B.C.A.C. 10; 352 W.A.C. 10; 2005 BCCA 225, refd to......
  • Weldon et al. v. Teck Metals Ltd. et al., 2012 BCSC 1386
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 26, 2012
    ...In another case relied upon by Towers, British Columbia Veterinary Medical Assn. v. Bishop (c.o.b. The Horse's Mouth Equine Dentistry) , 2006 BCSC 556, Cohen J. said: [46] Applying the Original Meaning Rule in statutory interpretation is the exception rather than the rule. As set out in S u......
  • R. v. MacKinnon (G.), 2014 ABPC 150
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 10, 2014
    ...(2006), 286 Sask.R. 272; 2006 SKPC 80, dist. [para. 51]. British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association v. Bishop, [2006] B.C.T.C. 556; 2006 BCSC 556, dist. [para. Nebraska (Department of Health) v. Jeffrey, 247 Neb. 100; 525 N.W.(2d) 193, dist. [para. 55]. Counsel: Lori Chambers, for the ......
3 cases
  • R. v. Ryan (P.), (2006) 286 Sask.R. 272 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 6, 2006
    ...(2002), 328 A.R. 59; 2002 ABQB 848, refd to. [para. 40]. British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association v. Bishop, [2006] B.C.T.C. 556; 2006 BCSC 556, refd to. [para. British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association v. MacDonald (2005), 213 B.C.A.C. 10; 352 W.A.C. 10; 2005 BCCA 225, refd to......
  • Weldon et al. v. Teck Metals Ltd. et al., 2012 BCSC 1386
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 26, 2012
    ...In another case relied upon by Towers, British Columbia Veterinary Medical Assn. v. Bishop (c.o.b. The Horse's Mouth Equine Dentistry) , 2006 BCSC 556, Cohen J. said: [46] Applying the Original Meaning Rule in statutory interpretation is the exception rather than the rule. As set out in S u......
  • R. v. MacKinnon (G.), 2014 ABPC 150
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 10, 2014
    ...(2006), 286 Sask.R. 272; 2006 SKPC 80, dist. [para. 51]. British Columbia Veterinary Medical Association v. Bishop, [2006] B.C.T.C. 556; 2006 BCSC 556, dist. [para. Nebraska (Department of Health) v. Jeffrey, 247 Neb. 100; 525 N.W.(2d) 193, dist. [para. 55]. Counsel: Lori Chambers, for the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT