Virk v Law Society of Alberta,
Judge | The Honourable Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Justice Frederica Schutz |
Neutral Citation | 2022 ABCA 2 |
Citation | 2022 ABCA 2 |
Docket Number | 2103-0126AC |
Date | 06 January 2022 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 v Alston,
...binding authority, whether it is for him or against him, as has been well known for 70 years”); Virk v. Law Society of Alberta, 2022 ABCA 2, ¶¶ 20-21 (“Citation #15 alleged that the appellant ‘failed to be candid with the Court’. All agree that intentio......
-
2023 ABCA 46,
...binding authority, whether it is for him or against him, as has been well known for 70 years”); Virk v. Law Society of Alberta, 2022 ABCA 2, ¶¶ 20-21 (“Citation #15 alleged that the appellant ‘failed to be candid with the Court’. All agree that intentio......
-
May v Law Society of British Columbia,
...statements which the lawyer knows to be false”. 7 The statements of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Virk v. Law Society of Alberta, 2022 ABCA 2 are equally valid in British Columbia: [20] Citation #15 alleged that the appellant “failed to be candid with the Court”. All a......
3 cases
-
Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 v Alston,
...binding authority, whether it is for him or against him, as has been well known for 70 years”); Virk v. Law Society of Alberta, 2022 ABCA 2, ¶¶ 20-21 (“Citation #15 alleged that the appellant ‘failed to be candid with the Court’. All agree that intentio......
-
2023 ABCA 46,
...binding authority, whether it is for him or against him, as has been well known for 70 years”); Virk v. Law Society of Alberta, 2022 ABCA 2, ¶¶ 20-21 (“Citation #15 alleged that the appellant ‘failed to be candid with the Court’. All agree that intentio......
-
May v Law Society of British Columbia,
...statements which the lawyer knows to be false”. 7 The statements of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Virk v. Law Society of Alberta, 2022 ABCA 2 are equally valid in British Columbia: [20] Citation #15 alleged that the appellant “failed to be candid with the Court”. All a......