VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Ritu Khullar |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 389 |
| Docket Number | 2003-0054-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 03 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...433, 633 VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389....................................................................................................................................... 633 VMH v JH, 2020 ABQB 156......................................................................................................
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...Root v Root, [2008] OJ No 2716 (SCJ); Sharma v Sunak, 2011 ONSC 7670; Peerenboom v Peerenboom, 2018 ONSC 5118 (Div Ct). Compare VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389 applying Rule 12.36 of the Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010. See also Armoyan v Armoyan, 2015 NSSC 92 applying Rule 77.02 (1) of t......
-
JWS v CJS aka CJH,
...an order directing the Father to pay her $60,000 in advance costs for the appeal. [41] As recently stated by this Court in VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389 at paras This Court has jurisdiction to make an advanced costs order under r 12.36 of the Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010. The conside......
-
R v Dubroy-Clement,
...of robbing Butt: AD at paras 30-31; R v Watson, 2008 ONCA 614 at para 24 [Watson]; R v Manley, 2011 ONCA 128 at paras 60-61; R v Cudmore, 2020 ABCA 389 at para [129] The Crown does not argue the evidence makes out proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused comm......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
JWS v CJS aka CJH,
...an order directing the Father to pay her $60,000 in advance costs for the appeal. [41] As recently stated by this Court in VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389 at paras This Court has jurisdiction to make an advanced costs order under r 12.36 of the Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010. The conside......
-
R v Dubroy-Clement,
...of robbing Butt: AD at paras 30-31; R v Watson, 2008 ONCA 614 at para 24 [Watson]; R v Manley, 2011 ONCA 128 at paras 60-61; R v Cudmore, 2020 ABCA 389 at para [129] The Crown does not argue the evidence makes out proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused comm......
-
Rolinger v Rolinger,
...to exercise its discretion to permit an appeal of that order. [paras 8-10] [emphasis added] [145] In VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389, Khullar J. (in chambers) assessed the applicant’s need for This branch of the test requires that the applicant “genuinely canno......
-
Moshinsky-Helm v Helm,
...some time ago my colleague Khullar JA made an order for the applicant to receive $20,000 in advance costs for the appeal: H(VM) v H(J), 2020 ABCA 389, 14 Alta LR (7th) 64. Since the applicant remains unrepresented, I am not certain of what has happened with respect to that advance or if the......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...433, 633 VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389....................................................................................................................................... 633 VMH v JH, 2020 ABQB 156......................................................................................................
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...Root v Root, [2008] OJ No 2716 (SCJ); Sharma v Sunak, 2011 ONSC 7670; Peerenboom v Peerenboom, 2018 ONSC 5118 (Div Ct). Compare VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389 applying Rule 12.36 of the Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010. See also Armoyan v Armoyan, 2015 NSSC 92 applying Rule 77.02 (1) of t......