Vujicic v Estate of Leona Donna MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263

JudgeHo,Pentelechuk,Wakeling
Date08 August 2022
Docket Number2101-0022AC; 2101-0023AC
Citation2022 ABCA 263
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 7, 2024
    ...JJ.A. (“The governing principles of statutory interpretation are straightforward and not contentious”); Vujicic v. Estate of MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263, ¶ 62; 26 C.C.L.I. 6th 182, 217 per Wakeling, J.A. (“The proper approach to interpreting legislative provisions is not contentious in common......
  • Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 2, 2025
    ...JJ. A. (“The governing principles of statutory interpretation are straightforward and not contentious”); Vujicic v. Estate of MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263, ¶ 62; 26 C.C.L.I. 6th 182, 217 per Wakeling, J.A. (“The proper approach to interpreting legislative provisions is not contentious in commo......
  • Landry v Rocky View County (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 5, 2025
    ...it must be enforced however harsh or absurd or contrary to common sense the result may be”). 29 Vujicic v. Estate of MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263, ¶ 70; 51 Alta. L.R. 7th 1, 43 per Wakeling, 30 Ursa Ventures Ltd. v. City of Edmonton, 2016 ABCA 135, ¶ 85, 91 C.P.C 7th 73, 106 per Wakeling, J.A.......
3 cases
  • Glamorgan Landing Estates GP Inc. v Calgary (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 7, 2024
    ...JJ.A. (“The governing principles of statutory interpretation are straightforward and not contentious”); Vujicic v. Estate of MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263, ¶ 62; 26 C.C.L.I. 6th 182, 217 per Wakeling, J.A. (“The proper approach to interpreting legislative provisions is not contentious in common......
  • Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 2, 2025
    ...JJ. A. (“The governing principles of statutory interpretation are straightforward and not contentious”); Vujicic v. Estate of MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263, ¶ 62; 26 C.C.L.I. 6th 182, 217 per Wakeling, J.A. (“The proper approach to interpreting legislative provisions is not contentious in commo......
  • Landry v Rocky View County (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 5, 2025
    ...it must be enforced however harsh or absurd or contrary to common sense the result may be”). 29 Vujicic v. Estate of MacEachern, 2022 ABCA 263, ¶ 70; 51 Alta. L.R. 7th 1, 43 per Wakeling, 30 Ursa Ventures Ltd. v. City of Edmonton, 2016 ABCA 135, ¶ 85, 91 C.P.C 7th 73, 106 per Wakeling, J.A.......