Vyshnevskyy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881

CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 03, 2020
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2020 FC 881
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Aragon Caicedo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 485
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 5, 2023
    ...with concrete evidence that an IFA is not viable once it has been raised by the RPD: Vyshnevskyy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881 [Vyshnevskyy] at paras 32-34; Iyere v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 67 at paras 41-42; Cherednyk v Canada (Citizenship and Imm......
  • Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 935
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 28, 2020
    ...para 43; Pardo Quitian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 846 at para 18; Vyshnevskyy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881 at para 18. The central question is whether the procedure was fair, having regard to all of the circumstances: Canadian Pacific at para 54; ......
  • Kita v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1084
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 23, 2020
    ...para 43; Pardo Quitian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 846 at para 18; Vyshnevskyy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881 at para 18. [8] While the requirements of procedural fairness are flexible and context-specific (Vavilov at para 77), once they are defined,......
  • Espana Alvarez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 9, 2021
    ...e.g., Cherednyk v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 873 at para 28, citing Vyshnevskyy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881 at paras 30-35). However, a decision maker should be cautious about drawing such an inference where the evidence of a criminal gang’s......
4 cases
  • Aragon Caicedo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 485
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 5, 2023
    ...with concrete evidence that an IFA is not viable once it has been raised by the RPD: Vyshnevskyy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881 [Vyshnevskyy] at paras 32-34; Iyere v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 67 at paras 41-42; Cherednyk v Canada (Citizenship and Imm......
  • Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 935
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 28, 2020
    ...para 43; Pardo Quitian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 846 at para 18; Vyshnevskyy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881 at para 18. The central question is whether the procedure was fair, having regard to all of the circumstances: Canadian Pacific at para 54; ......
  • Kita v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1084
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 23, 2020
    ...para 43; Pardo Quitian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 846 at para 18; Vyshnevskyy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881 at para 18. [8] While the requirements of procedural fairness are flexible and context-specific (Vavilov at para 77), once they are defined,......
  • Espana Alvarez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 9, 2021
    ...e.g., Cherednyk v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 873 at para 28, citing Vyshnevskyy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 881 at paras 30-35). However, a decision maker should be cautious about drawing such an inference where the evidence of a criminal gang’s......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT