Walsh v. BDO Dunwoody LLP et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1463

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeFitzpatrick, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,PRACTICE
Date13 August 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • CNOOC Petroleum North America ULC v 801 Seventh Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 21 d4 Abril d4 2022
    ...on the issues to be determined at trial is generally inadmissible: see Boily v Canada, 2017 FC 1021 and the law canvassed in Walsh v BDO, 2013 BCSC 1463. It is expected that the development of domestic law will be explained by counsel, not by experts. In addition, it is understood that the ......
  • Rogers v. Rogers Communications Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 5 d5 Novembro d5 2021
    ...how the issue should be decided (commonly described as addressing the “ultimate issue”): Walsh v. BDO Dunwoody LLP, 2013 BCSC 1463 at [114]     Here, Mr. Emerson goes to great lengths to describe how the process under the Consent Resolution does not co......
  • Cottrell v. Cottrell,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 12 d1 Setembro d1 2022
    ...in relation to domestic law, a well established proposition discussed in detail by Justice Fitzpatrick in Walsh v. BDO Dunwoody LLP, 2013 BCSC 1463. While I have not formally excluded Ms. Clough’s evidence given the lack of an objection by Paul, I have not relied upon it and have rea......
  • BlackBerry Limited v. The King, 2023 TCC 137
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • 12 d2 Setembro d2 2023
    ...Federation v Ontario (1998), 39 OR (3d) (OnCt.) pp.10-11 [“Ontario Teachers”] [2] Walsh v BDO Dunwoody LLP, 2013 BCSC 1463 at paragraph 49 [3] Marzen Artistic Aluminum Ltd. v HMQ, 2014 TCC 194 [“Marzen”] [4] Knights of Columbus v R, 2008 TCC 307 at paragraphs 34-......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Rogers v. Rogers Communications Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 5 d5 Novembro d5 2021
    ...how the issue should be decided (commonly described as addressing the “ultimate issue”): Walsh v. BDO Dunwoody LLP, 2013 BCSC 1463 at [114]     Here, Mr. Emerson goes to great lengths to describe how the process under the Consent Resolution does not co......
  • CNOOC Petroleum North America ULC v 801 Seventh Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 21 d4 Abril d4 2022
    ...on the issues to be determined at trial is generally inadmissible: see Boily v Canada, 2017 FC 1021 and the law canvassed in Walsh v BDO, 2013 BCSC 1463. It is expected that the development of domestic law will be explained by counsel, not by experts. In addition, it is understood that the ......
  • Cottrell v. Cottrell,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 12 d1 Setembro d1 2022
    ...in relation to domestic law, a well established proposition discussed in detail by Justice Fitzpatrick in Walsh v. BDO Dunwoody LLP, 2013 BCSC 1463. While I have not formally excluded Ms. Clough’s evidence given the lack of an objection by Paul, I have not relied upon it and have rea......
  • BlackBerry Limited v. The King, 2023 TCC 137
    • Canada
    • Tax Court (Canada)
    • 12 d2 Setembro d2 2023
    ...Federation v Ontario (1998), 39 OR (3d) (OnCt.) pp.10-11 [“Ontario Teachers”] [2] Walsh v BDO Dunwoody LLP, 2013 BCSC 1463 at paragraph 49 [3] Marzen Artistic Aluminum Ltd. v HMQ, 2014 TCC 194 [“Marzen”] [4] Knights of Columbus v R, 2008 TCC 307 at paragraphs 34-......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT