Wang v. Epoch Press Ltd., 2017 BCSC 136

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Verhoeven
Citation2017 BCSC 136
Date30 January 2017
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS153227
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Treasure Bay HK Limited v. 1115830 B.C. Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 Marzo 2022
    ...BC Defendants. [29]        The first three cases are: (1) EY Holdings; (2) Wang v. Epoch Press Ltd., 2017 BCSC 136; and (3) Goldstream. Each one involved a derivative action brought on behalf of a British Columbia corporation subject to the BCBCA, but with......
  • Sidhu v. Popat, 2019 BCSC 1334
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 12 Agosto 2019
    ...to clearly define the issues of fact and law that are to be determined by the court and/or for being vexatious: Wang v. Epoch Press Ltd., 2017 BCSC 136. [22]        The ANOCC, say the defendants, fails to adequately define the issues as they relate to clai......
  • FORCOMP Forestry Consulting Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 BCSC 1157
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 7 Julio 2017
    ...of the individual Defendants and other staff in FAIB and other branches of the Ministry. Legal Framework In Wang v. Epoch Press Ltd., 2017 BCSC 136, Verhoeven J. this comprehensive statement of the law that is to be applied on this type of application: [6] Rule 9-5 of the Rules provides in ......
3 cases
  • Treasure Bay HK Limited v. 1115830 B.C. Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 Marzo 2022
    ...BC Defendants. [29]        The first three cases are: (1) EY Holdings; (2) Wang v. Epoch Press Ltd., 2017 BCSC 136; and (3) Goldstream. Each one involved a derivative action brought on behalf of a British Columbia corporation subject to the BCBCA, but with......
  • Sidhu v. Popat, 2019 BCSC 1334
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 12 Agosto 2019
    ...to clearly define the issues of fact and law that are to be determined by the court and/or for being vexatious: Wang v. Epoch Press Ltd., 2017 BCSC 136. [22]        The ANOCC, say the defendants, fails to adequately define the issues as they relate to clai......
  • FORCOMP Forestry Consulting Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 BCSC 1157
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 7 Julio 2017
    ...of the individual Defendants and other staff in FAIB and other branches of the Ministry. Legal Framework In Wang v. Epoch Press Ltd., 2017 BCSC 136, Verhoeven J. this comprehensive statement of the law that is to be applied on this type of application: [6] Rule 9-5 of the Rules provides in ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT